Simulasi Software PVSyst 7.3 pada Rancangan Sistem PLTS On-Grid 48,4 kWp di Gedung Perpustakaan PNJ Serta Analisa Aspek Tekno-Ekonomi dan Carbon Saving

Authors

  • Andre halomoan Sitorus politeknik negeri jakarta
  • Noor Hidayati Jurusan Teknik MesinPoliteknik Negeri Jakarta
  • Tatun Hayatun Nufus politeknik negeri jakarta
  • Arifia Eka Yuliana politeknik negeri jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32722/jmt.v4i3.5996

Keywords:

Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya (PLTS), On-Grid, Tekno-Ekonomi, Carbon Saving, PVSyst.

Abstract

As a public facility, the Jakarta State Polytechnic Library Building has a significant electricity demand for its operations. This electricity demand is currently fulfilled through the supply from the PLN electricity grid. The implementation of a Solar Photovoltaic System (SPV) in the Jakarta State Polytechnic Library Building can have positive impact in the long run as it does not require fuel and requires minimal maintenance. Therefore, this research conducts a simulation using PVSyst 7.3 software to design an on-grid SPV system with a capacity of 48.4 kWp for the Jakarta State Polytechnic Library Building. It also performs techno-economic analysis to assess the investment impact of its implementation and analyzes carbon saving to understand the environmental impact of the SPV system. The simulation results of the PVSyst 7.3 on-grid SPV system with a capacity of 48.4 kWp show an energy output of 68.55 MWh per year, a specific production of 1416 kWh/kWp per year, and a system efficiency of 80.36%. The techno-economic calculations of the SPV system reveal a Net Present Value of Rp. 951,624,881, an Internal Rate of Return of 9.76%, a Return of Investment of 145.54%, a Levelized Cost of Energy of Rp. 781/kWh, and a Payback Period of 9 years and 4 months. Furthermore, the carbon saving achieved from the implementation of the SPV system is equivalent to 1379 tons of CO2

References

G. Riawan, I. N. S. Kumara, and W. G. Ariastina, Maj. Ilm. Teknol. Elektro 21, 63 (2022).

P. E. Chris Burk, Chem. Eng. Prog. 114, 266 (2018).

G. Alvianingsih and J. C. H. Simanjuntak, Sutet 11, 1 (2021).

B. Winardi, A. Nugroho, and E. Dolphina, J. Tekno 16, 1 (2019).

W. Short, D. Packey, and T. Holt, Renew. Energy 95, 73 (1995).

T. Darmana and E. Faizatul Hikmah, J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Res. 3, 181 (n.d.).

EPRI, Budgeting for Solar PV Plant Operations & Maintenance : Practices (2015).

PT. PLN (PERSERO), Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga List. 2021-2030 2019 (2021).

P. O. of S. and Technology, Combustion 43, 4 (2006).

G. Amit and P. Tinus, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Japan, 2006).

U. S. E. P. Agency, ANNEX 2 Methodology and Data for Estimating CO 2 Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion (1997).

B. Bernal, L. T. Murray, and T. R. H. Pearson, Carbon Balance Manag. 13, (2018).

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Sitorus, A. halomoan, Hidayati, N., Nufus, T. H., & Yuliana, A. E. (2023). Simulasi Software PVSyst 7.3 pada Rancangan Sistem PLTS On-Grid 48,4 kWp di Gedung Perpustakaan PNJ Serta Analisa Aspek Tekno-Ekonomi dan Carbon Saving. Jurnal Mekanik Terapan, 4(3), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.32722/jmt.v4i3.5996

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.