Profil Nelayan Penangkap Ikan Demersal Di Kampung Laotongan (Pulau Tehang) Kecamatan Tabukan Selatan Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe

Costantein Imanuel Sarapil; Ishak Bawias; Eunike Irene Kumaseh; Getruida Nita Mozes; Ganjar Ndaru Ikhtiagung; Reinaldi Menggalebose

doi:10.32722/epi.v17i1.3365

About Journal

Focus and Scope

The proposed articles can come from the fields of languages, social sciences, cultures, and education.

Peer Review Process

Peer-reviewers assist the editors in making decisions to accept or reject articles that enter EPIGRAM (e-journal), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blind review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It aims to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by a reviewer using track change in the article. All comments and suggestions from the reviewers are written using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer teams in communicating the results of the review. Thus, EPIGRAM (e-journal) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewers to the editorial team.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its contents on the principle to make research freely available to the public in order to support a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics Statement

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Foreword

The ethics of scientific publications in EPIGRAM (e-journal) is used to guide that all the writings published in the journal have followed ethical principles in academic publications to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. This paper presents several articles related to the field of language, social science, culture, and education on ethics in this journal publication (authors, editors, truthful partners, publishers, and readers).

Guidelines on Ethics in Journal Publications

EPIGRAM (e-journal) publishes articles from the results of scientific research in the field of language, social science, culture, education and has not been edited or in the process of submission in other publications.

The proposed articles can come from the fields of languages, social sciences, cultures, and education.

EPIGRAM (e-journal) is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of an article in building a coherent and recognized network of knowledge about languages, social sciences, cultures, and education. The papers sent to EPIGRAM (e-journal) must be able to point the quality of the writing of the author. Therefore, it is essential to arrange standards in ethical behavior for all colleague engaged in the publication: authors, editors, partners, publishers, and journal sponsors.

AUTHOR'S ASSIGNMENT

Standard Article

Articles are original reports of research results and present accurate articles from research conducted by the objectives. The data presented in the paper must be accurate based on research results. Published articles must be adequate and detailed so that they can use as references or references for other researchers. The team editor will not accept presented data, not by ethical behavior in EPIGRAM (e-journal).

Plagiarism and Originality

The author has to ensure the article written is the original work of the author himself. If the author enters the results of the research or references from others, the author must admit the name of the author of the article. Plagiarism is an action of imitating and copying all items relating to what is written by another writer and claimed by another author without including the original author. This deed of plagiarism is unethical behavior in the publication and not able accepted in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Entering the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

The Authors and Co-authors of the Article

The author and co-authors of the article are who has engaged significantly to the concept of writing, those who have contributed to significant contributions registered as co-authors. The author must assure the conformity of the articles with the co-authors before submitting for EPIGRAM (e-journal).

Errors in Published Articles

When the author discovers a fundamental mistake or inaccuracy in the research that will be published by the EPIGRAM (e-journal), the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and correct it.

EDITORIAL BOARD OF ASSIGNMENTS

Publication Decision and Justice in Publication

The editorial team of EPIGRAM (e-journal) is responsible for deciding which articles publish in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Sustainable reviewers work closely with the editorial team in determining which they are eligible to be published in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Editors and sustainable partners evaluate the articles for content regardless of gender, relatives, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political philosophy of the writer.

Confidentiality of the Process Publication

The Editors and staff editors prevent the leak of author confidentiality and the writing before the article published in EPIGRAM (e-journal). The editorial team and editorial staff did not give the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable reviewers to ensure that reviewing in the blinded review paper.

Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Entered articles but not published in EPIGRAM (e-journal) may not be used by the editorial team in their research without the written approval of the author. Specific data obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal concerns. The editorial team conducts appropriate actions in addressing this, such as publication.

Cooperation and Engagement in Publication

The editor will take steps when there is an ethics complaint in the paper. These steps start from contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the claim in objection, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and appropriate actions related to the charge.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

The Decision of the Editorial Team

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters EPIGRAM (e-journal), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, EPIGRAM (e-journal) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

Punctuality

The review process in EPIGRAM (e-journal) generally takes 1-4 months, and if the review process takes longer because of one reason or another, the editor will communicate to the author. The editor team expects the administrative review process, the improvement of the author and the publication of the article, taken out six months.

Confidentiality

Every received article treated as a confidential document. The section may not be discussed with other parties unless permitted by the editorial board.

The Review Must be Objective

The editor team strives to review articles objectively. The results of the analyses have to sharpen the writing, especially in strengthening the results and discussion of the research objectives so that it can support the improvement of the article.

Source / Reference Recognition

The reviewer should identify relevant research that will be published that there is no plagiarism by the author. The reviewer must observe, explore each statement in the discussion and report by the relevant quote. Reviewers must also provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the articles before the article is published.

Screening For Plagiarism

The documents must meet the maximum similarity limit of 20% to proceed to the review process. To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application Ithenticate

Published Oct 25, 2020

https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v17i1.3365

Download

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Statistic

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020)

Costantein Imanuel Sarapil

Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara

Ishak Bawias

Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara

Eunike Irene Kumaseh

Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara

Getruida Nita Mozes

Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara

Ganjar Ndaru Ikhtiagung

Politeknik Negeri Cilacap

Reinaldi Menggalebose

Politeknik Negeri Nusa Utara

Abstract

This study aims to determine the marketing margins of demersal fish in Laotongan Village. Laotongan Village, or another name for Tehang Island, is one of the islands in District of Tabukan Selatan, Regency of Sangihe Archipelago. The method used is qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative methods are methods that look at phenomena from non-material aspects, beyond what they appear to be, with the study of meaning as something holistic. Meanwhile, the quantitative method is a method that looks at the phenomenon from the material aspect, which is visible, the impact study, the factors that affect it as a variable. In general, fisher who catch fish in Laotongan Village use hand line, in the local language it is called Kakintu. Also, the type boat used is pumpboat. The fisher in Laotongan Village are fisher with low income, and most of the fisher have an elementary education level. Marketing margin of Demersal fish is Rp. 15,000., And the efficiency of the portion received by fisher, F = 57%, F> 50%, where the sales of demersal fish are efficient. However, fisher's welfare has not improved. One of the factors is the extravagant fisher's lifestyle. The government can pay attention to the welfare of fisher.

How to Cite

Sarapil, C. I., Bawias, I., Kumaseh, E. I., Mozes, G. N., Ikhtiagung, G. N., & Menggalebose, R. (2020). Profil Nelayan Penangkap Ikan Demersal Di Kampung Laotongan (Pulau Tehang) Kecamatan Tabukan Selatan Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe. EPIGRAM (e-Journal), 17(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v17i1.3365

References

Anonimous. 2015. Data Kampung Laotongan Kecamatan Tabukan Selatan. Pemerintah Kampung Laotongan Kecamatan Tabukan Selatan. Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe
Firdaus, M. & Witomo, C. M. 2014. Analisis Tingkat Kesejahteraan dan Ketimpangan Pendapatan Rumah Tangga Nelayan Pelagis Besar di Sendang Biru, Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan & Perikanan, 9(2): 155 – 168
Hapsari, T. D. 2013. Distribusi dan Margin Pemasaran Hasil Tangkapan Ikan Tongkol (Euthynnus affinis) di TPI Ujungbatu Jepara. Jurnal Ilmu Perikanan dan Sumberdaya Perairan, 2(2): 131 – 138
Huda, M., Solihin, I., & Lubis, E. 2015. Tingkat Efisien Pemasaran Ikan Laut Segar di Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara Brondong. Jurnal Teknologi Perikanan dan Kelautan, 6(1): 91 – 104
Rosin. 2017. Analisis Tingkat Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Nelayan di Desa Dahari Selebar Kecamatan Talawi Kabupaten Batubara. Jurnal Geografi, 9(1): 53 – 66
Sarapil, C. I. & Lungari, F. F. 2017. Analisis Kesiapan Teknologi Komponen Humanware Kelompok Nelayan di Tidore dan Santiago Berdasarkan Jenis Alat Tangkap.Jurnal Ilmiah Tindalung, 3(2): 55 – 59
Sarapil, C. I., Tamarol, J., & Kumaseh, E. I. 2019. Potret Masyarakat Nelayan Penangkap Ikan di Pulau Lipang Kecamatan Kendahe Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe Propinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Tindalung, 5(2): 61 – 70
Sarapil, C. I. & Wuaten, J. F. 2017. Manajemen Rumah Tangga Nelayan Penangkap Ikan Tuna (Thunnus albacores) Studi Kasus di Pesisir Pantai Akembuala Kelurahan Santiago Kecamatan Tahuna Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe. Jurnal Ilmiah Tindalung, 3(1): 23 – 30
Sarempaa, E. S., Mantjoro, E. & Lumenta, V. 2017. Kondisi Perusahaan Perikanan di Kota Bitung Pasca Moratorium 2014. Akulturasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Agrobisnis Perikanan, 5(9): 677 – 686
Subadi Tjipto, 2004. Penelitian Kualitatif. Cet 1, Surakarta; Penerbit Muhammadiyah University Press Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 124 hal
Sugiharto, E. 2007. Tingkat Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Nelayan Desa Benua Baru Ilir Berdasarkan Indikator Badan Pusat Statistik. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Perencanaan, 4(2): 32 – 36
Tamarol, J., & Sarapil, C. I. 2018. Kajian Sosial Ekonomi Rumah Tangga Nelayan Pancing Ulur (Hand line) Perorangan di Kecamatan Tabukan Utara Kabupaten Sangihe. Jurnal Ilmiah Tindalung, 4(2): 89 – 98
Triyanti, R. & Shafitri, N. 2012. Kajian Pemasaran Ikan Lele (Clarias Sp) Dalam Mendukung Industri Perikanan Budidaya (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Boyolali, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan & Perikanan, 7(2): 177 – 191
Yapanani, E., Solichin, A., & Argo W., B. 2013. Kajian Hasil Tangkapan dan Tingkat Kesejahteraan Nelayan di Desa Aromarea Distrik Kosiwo, Kabupaten Sarui Kepulauan Yapen, Papua. Journal of Management of Aquatic Resources, 2(3): 197 – 202
Zebua, Y., Wildani, P. K., Lasefa, A., & Rahmad, R. 2017. Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Tingkat Kesejahteraan Nelayan Pesisir Pantai Sri Mersing Desa Kuala Lama Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Geografi, 9(1): 88 – 98

About Journal

Focus and Scope

Peer Review Process

Open Access Policy

Publication Ethic

Screening For Plagiarism

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References