MODIFIKASI SIMPANG BERSINYAL PADA PEMBUKAAN PINTU KELUAR-MASUK JALAN TOL

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Achmad Ibnu Faishal
Daniya Tiarani
Eva Azhra Latifa

Abstract

This intersection was formed as a result of the opening of toll road access, so careful planning is required to avoid any potential problems. The purpose of this study is to examine the performance of the RE Martadinata Road in Ciputat because of access to the Serpong-Cinere Toll Road, as well as the performance of the signalized intersection formed as a result of the toll access. The research process starts with field data collecting and analysis using the PKJI 2014. The examination of the 2/2TT road section's results reveals that the Ciputat and Pondok Cabe sections had the greatest saturation levels at 1,28 and 1,54, respectively. With the degree of saturation on Ciputat route 0,72 and 0,76 on Pondok Cabe route, the road is enlarging to 4/2T on the Pondok Cabe portion. The analysis of signalized junctions with the initial assumption of three phases complete and without the influence of bus pool traffic produced results with a degree of saturation in the north of 0,98 and a degree of saturation in the south of 1,11. The degree of saturation on the North half was 0,58 after the solution of changing APILL to two phases, setting green time, shifting the bus pool, and not turning right. With the influence of pool bus traffic, a saturation degree of 1,10 was obtained in the south part of 0,97, having completed the solutions for the South part of 0,60. With the influence of pool bus traffic, the Western portion of 0,96 reached a saturation level of 1,37, After completing of the West section of 0,46 solutions. The degree of saturation on the South section rises to 0,94 in the fourth year. To ensure that it still complies with the intersection's qualifying conditions, a review is required.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Darat, 2015. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan No.75 tahun 2015 tentang penyelenggaraan analisis dampak lalu lintas.
  2. Departemen Perhubungan RI, “Penyelenggaraan Bidang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan,” Jakarta Dep. Perhub. RI., no. 085113, 2021.
  3. U. Enggarsasi and N. K. Sa’diyah, “Kajian Terhadap Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Dalam Upaya Perbaikan Pencegahan Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas,” Perspektif, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 228, 2017, doi: 10.30742/perspektif. v22i3.632.
  4. D. S. Gede Sumarda, Made Kariyana, “Analisa Kinerja U- Turn Dan Ruas Jalan Di Jalan By Pass Ngurah Rai Denpasar,” (Studi Kasus Jalan By Pass Ngurah Rai Denpasar Di Depan SPBU Suwung Sanur), vol. 11, no. April, pp. 32–44, 2019, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15937.30567.
  5. G. S. Marunsenge, J. A. Timboeleng, and L. Elisabeth, “Pengaruh Hambatan Samping terhadap Kinerja pada Ruas Jalan Panjaitan (Kelenteng Ban Hing Kiong),” J. Sipil Statik, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 571–582, 2015.
  6. Y. R. Kunarti and N. Najid, “Evaluasi Faktor Hambatan Samping Pada Penentuan Kapasitas Jalan Studi Kasus: Jalan Jendral Sudirman Jakarta,” JMTS J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 855, 2021, doi: 10.24912/jmts. v4i4.15164.
  7. KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN
  8. UMUM, “Kapasitas Jalan Luar Kota,” Pandu. Kapasitas Jalan Indones., 2014.
  9. F. S. Kevin and T. B. Joewono, “Estimasi Kapasitas Jalan Tol Cipularang mengunakan metode sustained flow index,” J. Transp., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 161–170, 2020.
  10. R. F. Putra and E. A. Latifa, “Performance Analysis of Signalized Intersection Due to Opening of Jatikarya Exit Access to Cimanggis – Cibitung Toll Segment Using PTV Vissim Software,” Log. J. Ranc. Bangun dan Teknol., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1– 8, 2022, doi: 10.31940/logic. v22i1.1-8.
  11. H. E. Prasetyo and Trijeti, “Analisis Tingkat Pelayanan Jalan (Studi Kasus Jalan Ciledug Raya, Depan Universitas Budhi Luhur Jakarta Selatan),” J. Tek. Sipil, pp. 1–10, 2019, [Online]. Available: jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/semna stek.
  12. E. M. Malluluang, A. Alwi, and
  13. R. Rustamaji, “ANALISIS TINGKAT PELAYANAN JALAN (LoS) DAN KARAKTERISTIKLALU LINTAS PADA RUAS JALAN GUSTI SITUT MAHMUD KOTA PONTIANAK,” J. Tek.
  14. Sipil, vol. 17, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.26418/jtsft. v17i2.23892.
  15. Republik Indonesia. 2006. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan No. 14 KM Tahun 2006 tentang Manajemen dan Rekayasa Lalu Lintas di Jalan. Jakarta
  16. D. Sraun, A. L. E. Rumayar, and
  17. L. Jefferson, “ANALISA KINERJA LALU LINTAS PERSIMPANGAN LENGAN TIGA BERSIGNAL DI MANADO (Studi Kasus: Persimpangan Jalan R. E. Martadinata),” J. Sipil Statik, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 481–490, 2018.
  18. O. F. Suryaningsih, H. Hermansyah, and E. Kurniati, “Analisis Kinerja Simpang Bersinyal (Studi Kasus Jalan Hasanuddin-Jalan Kamboja, Sumbawa Besar),” INERSIA lNformasi dan Ekspose Has. Ris. Tek. SIpil dan Arsit., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2020, doi: 10.21831/inersia. v16i1.31317.
  19. A. Model, A. Jenuh, and P. Simpang, “Analisa Model Arus Jenuh Pada simpang Bersinyal ( wiwin yudistira ) Analisa Model Arus Jenuh Pada simpang Bersinyal ( wiwin yudistira ),” 2017.
  20. M. I. Mujahidin, A. Sumarsono, and S. Legowo, “Hubungan Tundaan Dan Panjang Antrian Terhadap Konsumsi Bahan Bakar Akibat Penyempitan Jalan (Bottleneck) Pada Pembangunan Flyover Palur (Studi Kasus : Jalan Raya Palur Km 7.5),” e-Journal Matriks Tek. Sipil, pp. 649–656, 2014.
  21. Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Darat, 2015. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 96 Tahun 2015 tentang pedoman pelaksanaan kegiatan manajemen dan rekayasa lalu lintas.