Roja Nafiyah
Nunung Martina


Technological developments in the construction sector are expanding, also supported by government regulations. BIM (Building Information Modeling) is one of the technological developments in the construction world. It is expected to help workers minimize errors that will harm the project. Projects that humans still interpret are prone to errors due to human error. This study aims to model three dimensions that function to realize the plan, examine differences in the results of BIM-based quantity takeoff using Autodesk Revit software with conventional methods in one of the bridge structures in Cinere - Jagorawi Toll Project Section 3A, and interview BIM experts with an aim to determine the factors that can affect BIM-based QTO output from the user's perspective. The two QTO outputs produce a difference of ± 0.32% in the volume of the concrete structure and ± 2.28% in the reinforcement volume, where the BIM-based QTO results are lower than the conventional method. The factors that affect the output of BIM-based QTO from the user's point of view, namely (a) the long duration of BIM user’s experience affects the accuracy and details in the modeling, which will affect the QTO output, and(b) the longer the duration of experience and practice time the higher the level of detail and accuracy. The results of the QTO are especially important in determining the overall project cost. An inaccuracy in conducting the QTO will have fatal consequences that can harm the project.

Keywords: Autodesk Revit, BIM (Building Information Modeling), Conventional Method, Quantity Takeoff.



  1. A. K. Nugraha, “… (Bim) Dalam Estimasi Quantity Take Off Material Pekerjaan Plumbing (Implementation The Concept Of Building Information Modelling (Bim) In Quantity Take Off …,” 2020.
  2. A. Monteiro and J. Poças Martins, “A survey on modeling guidelines for quantity takeoff-oriented BIM-based design,” Autom. Constr., vol. 35, pp. 238–253, 2013.
  3. I. Ramdani, A. Rozandi, D. Budiman, and K. Elena, “Implementasi Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) Pada Proyek Perumahan,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022.
  4. D. Benge and J. Davidson, “RICS new rules of measurement,” R. Inst. Chart. Surv., pp. 1–400, 2012.
  5. R. Apriansyah, “Implementasi Konsep Building Information Modelling (BIM) Dalam Estimasi Quantity Take Off Material Pekerjaan Struktural,” Univ. Islam Indones., 2021.
  6. S. Yun and S. Kim, “Basic Research on BIM-Based Quantity Take-off Guidelines,” Archit. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2013.
  7. G. Kulasekara, H. S. Jayasena, and K. A. T. O. Ranadewa, “Comparative Effectiveness of Quantity Surveying in a Building Information Modelling Implementation,” Second World Constr. Symp. 2013 Socio-Economic Sustain. Constr., no. June, pp. 101–107, 2013.
  8. W. P. Fung, H. Salleh, and F. A. Mohd Rahim, “Capability of Building Information Modeling Application in Quantity Surveying Practice,” J. Surv. Constr. Prop., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2014.
  9. P. Smith, “Project Cost Management with 5D BIM,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 226, no. October 2015, pp. 193–200, 2016.
  10. P. Wu, R. Jin, Y. Xu, F. Lin, Y. Dong, and Z. Pan, “The analysis of barriers to bim implementation for industrialized building construction: A China study,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021.
  11. A. S. Telaga, “A review of BIM (Building Information Modeling) implementation in Indonesia construction industry,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 352, no. 1, 2018.
  12. K. PUPR, Modul 3 - Prinsip Dasar Sistem Teknologi BIM an Implementasinya Di Indonesia, no. 1. Bandung, 2018.
  13. BPSDM PU, “Modul 12 - Perhitungan Volume, Analisa Harga Satuan, RAB, dan Spesifikasi Teknis,” 2018.
  14. P. M. Putri and V. K. Azies, Permodelan StrukturGedung 6 Lantai Dengan Menggunakan Aplikasi Autodesk Revit 2018 Untuk Perhitungan Volume, vol. D. 2018.
  15. D. Laorent, P. Nugraha, and J. Budiman, “Analisa Quantity Take-Off Dengan Menggunakan Autodesk Revit,” Dimens. Utama Tek. Sipil, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019.
  16. R. Jonathan and B. Anondho, “Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Pekerjaan Dak Beton Bertulang Antara Metode Bim Dengan Konvensional,” JMTS J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 271, 2021.