PERBANDINGAN PENURUNAN KONSOLIDASI METODE TERZAGHI DENGAN ASAOKA PADA VACUUM PRELOADING

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 28, 2023
https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v5i2.4750
Download
PERBANDINGAN PENURUNAN KONSOLIDASI METODE TERZAGHI DENGAN ASAOKA PADA VACUUM PRELOADING
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Construction and Material Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 Juli 2023

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fina Mayumi Boangmanalu
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
Istiatun Istiatun
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

Around 20 million hectares of Indonesia's total land area, or more than 10%, has soft soil. Soft soils can be problematic in construction projects due to their low bearing capacity, high water content, limited permeability, and high compressibility. Vacuum preloading, a technique to hasten consolidation by employing atmospheric pressure from the vacuum as a surcharge load, is one of the improvements for soft soil. The Terzaghi method is typically used to calculate the prediction of the final settlement and the time to reach the final settlement, however the forecast of settlement by the Terzaghi method produces better results than the actual settlement. To estimate the final settlement that takes place in the field, a method with a reliable level of accuracy is used—the Asaoka method. The main goals of this analysis are to determine the final settlement using the Asaoka method, the time needed to reach the final settlement using the Asaoka method, the degree of consolidation caused by vacuum preloading, and soil parameters that support notable differences between the Terzaghi method and Asaoka method using back analysis. According to both site reviews, the Terzaghi method produced settlement outcomes that were 36% and 79% higher than those obtained using the Asaoka method. The time required to reach 90% consolidation on both site reviews are 252 days and 196 days. The results of the Asaoka method used to calculate the degree of consolidation on both site reviews are 92.33% and 94.47%. The value of compression index (Cc), which was derived by back analysis calculations, is what most strongly supports the significant outcomes between the Terzaghi method and the Asaoka method.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. W. P. Kuswanda, “Prosiding Problematika Pembangunan Infrastruktur pada Tanah Lempung Lunak dan Alternatif Metoda Penggunaannya,” Pros. Semnas T.Sipil Unlam “Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Lahan Basah,” pp. 270–288, 2015
  2. N. I. R. R. Juliana, “Analisis Efek Prefabricated Vertical Drain Pada Timbunan Tanah Lunak Di Bandar Udara Kualanamu,” no. July 2012, 2021.
  3. Y. Rahmaniar, E. Priadi, and Aprianto, “Studi Analisis Konsolidasi Tanah Pada Area Modul 1 Di Area Perpanjangan Runaway Bandara Supadio Pontianak,” pp. 1–8.
  4. W. D. Siswoko Adi Saputro, Agus Setyo Muntohar, “Prediksi Penurunan Tanah Timbunan pada Perbaikan Tanah Lunak dengan Prefabricated Vertical Drain Pada Proyek Pembangunan Landas Pacu Bandara Ahmad Yani Semarang,” 2016, [Online]. Available: https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/27286/%0Ahttps://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/27286/11/Naskah Publikasi.pdf
  5. W. A. N. Aspar, E. N. Fitriani, and A. Arthono, “Perhitungan Kembali Nilai Koefisien Konsolidasi Pada Perbaikan Tanah Lempung Lunak,” Teknologi, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017.
  6. R. Rani, M. Yusa, and F. Fatnanta, “Evaluasi Kinerja Perbaikan Tanah menggunakan Metode Vacuum Consolidation pada Perluasan Bandara di Kota Jambi,” vol. 16, no. April, pp. 9–14, 2022.
  7. B. M. Das, Mekanika Tanah (Prinsip-prinsip Rekayasa Geoteknik. 1995.
  8. F. Ibrahim, G. S. Sentosa, and A. Kawanda, “Studi Kasus Perbandingan Analisis Penurunan Akibat Timbunan, Di Tangerang, Banten,” JMTS J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 85, 2019, doi: 10.24912/jmts.v2i2.4297.
  9. R. Yohanson et al., “Back Analysis Parameter Konsolidasi Pada Pembebanan Vakum,” pp. 81–92.
  10. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Persyaratan perancangan geoteknik,” 2017.
  11. C. E. Putra and C. A. Makarim, “Analisis Alternatif Perbaikan Tanah Lunak dan Sangat Lunak pada Jalan Tol,” JMTS J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 1137, 2020, doi:10.24912/jmts.v3i4.8382.
  12. M. A. Refi A, “Analisa Perbaikan Tanah Pada Pembangunan Jalan Tol Padangsicincin, Sumatera Barat Dengan Metode Preloading Kombinasi Prefabricated Vertical Drain,” Ensiklopedia J. Peranc., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 155–164, 2020.
  13. H. Edwin and A. Suhendra, “Analisis Metode Vacuum Preloading Untuk Mempercepat Konsolidasi Pada Tanah Lempung Lunak Jenuh Air,” JMTS J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 87, 2019, doi: 10.24912/jmts.v2i4.6166.
  14. H. C. Hardiyatmo, “Metode Vacuum Preloading Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Solusi Pembangunan Timbunan Di Atas Tanah Lunak,” vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 47–55, 2017.
  15. Z. F. Lilabsari, A. Munawir, Y. Zaika, and W. P. Kuswanda, “Evaluasi Kinerja Perbaikan Tanah Lunak Dengan Menggunakan Preloading Dan Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD),” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://rekayasasipil.ub.ac.id/index.php/rs/article/view/525.