ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS ALAT PANCANG HYDRAULIC STATIC PILE DRIVER UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KINERJA WAKTU PADA PROYEK APARTEMEN APPLE 3 CONDOVILLA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 6, 2021
https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i3.4162
Download
ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS ALAT PANCANG HYDRAULIC STATIC PILE DRIVER UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KINERJA WAKTU PADA PROYEK APARTEMEN APPLE 3 CONDOVILLA
Statistic
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Construction and Material Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 November 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Melati Puspitasari
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
Afrizal Nursin
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

The selection of work methods is very important, especially inthe deep pilling installation methode. Hydraulic Static Pile Driver (HSPD) piling equipment is selected since the method uses static pressure without negative impacts (noise and vibration) for residents around the project during piling process. However, it needs to find out effective and efficient levels, and also productivity of this method. This paper will discuss the productivity and some strategies to improve duration level of pilling equipment for Apple 3 Condovilla apartment project. From analysis, it was found that the productivity value was less than one (<1) for day 2 and 4. Several factors affect the productivity of the piling equipment, such as: late start or early quits on the schedule; equipment damage, worker skills, material production, material mobilization, location of pile material, and the final set of piling. Some strategies can be performed to improve duration, such as: workers coordination workers, periodic equipment maintenance, production, mobilization, and placement of materials.


Keywords: Hydraulic Static Pile Driver, Pilling, Productivity.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. N. L. D. Fitrianti, A. Ratnaningsih, and J. W. Soejipto, “Alat Diesel Hammer Dengan Hydraulic Hammer Pada Pekerjaan Pondasi Taing Pancang Dari Segi Waktu Dan Biaya( Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Jember Sport Center ),” pp. 1–5, 2014.
  2. S. Limanto, “Analisis Produktivitas Pemancangan Tiang Pancang Pada Bangunan Tinggi Apartemen,” Semin. Nas. 2009, no. January 2009, pp. 293–305, 2009.
  3. A. R. Hakim and A. Akbar, “Analisis Produktivitas Hydraulic Static Pile Driver Pada Pembangunan Apartemen Victoria Square Tower B Tangerang Banten,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 103, 2018, doi: 10.5614/jts.2018.25.2.3.
  4. H. Fadhila and A. Nursin, “Analisis Waktu Siklus Tower Crane Pada Proyek South Side Apartment,” Semin. Nas. Tek. Sipil Politek. Negeri Jakarta, pp. 659–666, 2019.
  5. Rahmat, G. Utomo, and E. Al Qurina, “Analysis of Pile Productivity With Jack in Pile for Workshop Construction,” TRANSUKMA, vol. 03, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2020.
  6. D. A. Puspita, “Analisa Produktivitas Alat Berat Diesel Hammer Dan Hydraulic Hammer Pada Pemasangan Pondasi Tiang Pancang Di Proyek Pembangunan Gedung 2 SMK 1 MUHAMMADIYAH Kepanjen Kabupaten Malang,” 2016.
  7. R. Tedjokusumo, V. Goenawan, P. S. Wulandari, and J. H. Kusuma, “Perbandingan produktivitas alat hydraulic hammer dan jack in pile di surabaya,” Dimens. Pratama Tek. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2013.
  8. A. Nursin, “Analisa Produksi Peralatan Untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Penekanan Biaya,” 1995.
  9. A. Dwiretnani and I. A. Daulay, “Kinerja Alat Hydraulic Static Pile Driver (HSPD) Pada Proyek Perluasan Terminal Bandara Sultan Thaha Jambi,” J. Talent. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 67, 2019, doi: 10.33087/talentasipil.v2i2.20.
  10. S. Asniko, G. Yanti, and F. Lubis, “Analisis Optimalisasi Penggunaan Alat Berat pada Proyek Pembangunan Menara Bank Rakyat Indonesia Pekanbaru,” J. Tek., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018.
  11. M. I. Pratama and A. Bhaskara, “Komparasi biaya dan waktu pekerjaan tiang pancang metode hydraulic static pile driver dengan drop hammer,” Rev. Civ. Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 62–68, 2020.
  12. J. Yulianto, “Pemilihan Alat Pancang Menggunakan Expert Choice,” J. Ris. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2017, doi: 10.20961/jrrs.v1i1.14720.
  13. A. Saepul, “Produktivitas Kerja Alat Hammer Pada Pondasi Tiang Pancang,” pp. 1–7, 2016.
  14. Monalisa, Indrayadi, and Pratiwi, “Analisa Produktivitas Peralatan Konstruksi Pada Proyek Pembangunan Infrastruktur Universitas Tanjungpura (IDB),” JeLAST, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2018.
  15. E. Saputra and Trijeti, “Produktivitas Alat Pancang Terhadap Analisa Waktu Pada Pekerjaan Banjir Kanal Timur,” Konstruksia, pp. 43–51.
  16. I. W. Jawat, “Metode Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Tiang Pancang Sistem Hidraulic Jack In,” Paduraksa, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2016.
  17. J. Yulianto Eko Warsito and J. Utomo Dwi Hatmoko, “Pemodelan Produktivitas Hydraulic Static Pile Driver Menggunakan Model Analitis Pada Tanah Berlanau,” J. Eng. Manag. Industial Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 175–184, 2016, doi: 10.21776/ub.jemis.2016.004.02.9 .