EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON STEEL AND POLYPROPYLENE FIBERS MORTAR BOND STRENGTH UNDER UNIAXIAL TENSION

Herry Suryadi Djayaprabha; Wisena Perceka; Angie Oriana

doi:10.32722/arcee.v5i01.6517

About Journal

FOCUS AND SCOPE

The proposed articles can come from the fields of material, structure, geotechnical, construction management, water resources, transportation, implementation method, health and safety work in planning, operating, evaluating, maintenance of building, bridge, and environment.

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

The Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

PUBLICATION ETHIC

Publication Ethics Statement

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS ARCEE JOURNAL

Foreword

The ethics of scientific publications in the ARCEE Journal is used to guide that all the writings published in the journal have followed ethical principles in academic publications to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. This paper presents several articles related to the field of science and technology in civil engineering and guidance on ethics in this journal publication (authors, editors, truthful partners, publishers, and readers).

Guidelines on Ethics in Journal Publications

The ARCEE Journal publishes articles from the results of scientific research in the field of civil engineering and environment and has not been edited or in the process of submission in other publications.

The proposed articles can come from the fields of material, structure, geotechnical, construction management, water resources, and environment, transportation, and implementation method & health and safety work in planning, operating, evaluating, and maintenance of building, bridge, and environment.

ARCEE journal is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of an article in building a coherent and recognized network of knowledge about civil engineering and environment. The papers sent to ARCEE Journal must be able to point the quality of the writing of the author. Therefore, it is essential to arrange standards in ethical behavior for all colleague engaged in the publication: authors, editors, partners, publishers, and journal sponsors.

AUTHOR'S ASSIGNMENT in the ARCEE Journal

Standard Article

Articles are original reports of research results and present accurate articles from research conducted by the objectives. The data presented in the paper must be accurate based on research results. Published articles must be adequate and detailed so that they can use as references or references for other researchers. The team editor will not accept presented data, not by ethical behavior in ARCEE Journal.

Plagiarism and Originality

The author has to ensure the article written is the original work of the author himself. If the author enters the results of the research or references from others, the author must admit the name of the author of the article. Plagiarism is an action of imitating and copying all items relating to what is written by another writer and claimed by another author without including the original author. This deed of plagiarism is unethi When Wcal behavior in the publication and not able accepted in Journal ARCEE. Entering the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

The authors and co-authors of the article

The author and co-authors of the article are who has engaged significantly to the concept of writing, those who have contributed to significant contributions registered as co-authors. The author must assure the conformity of the articles with the co-authors before submitting for ARCEE journal.

Errors in Published Articles

When the author discovers a fundamental mistake or inaccuracy in the research that will be published by the ARCEE journal, the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and correct it.

EDITORIAL BOARD OF ASSIGNMENTS in the ARCEE JOURNAL

Publication Decision and Justice in Publication

The editorial team of ARCEE Journal is responsible for deciding which articles publish in ARCEE. Sustainable reviewers work closely with the editorial team in determining which they are eligible to be published in ARCEE journal. Editors and sustainable partners evaluate the articles for content regardless of gender, relatives, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political philosophy of the writer.

Confidentiality of the Process Publication

The Editors and staff editors prevent the leak of author confidentiality and the writing before the article published in ARCEE Journal. The editorial team and editorial staff did not give the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable reviewers to ensure that reviewing in the blinded review paper.

Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Entered articles but not published in ARCEE Journal may not be used by the editorial team in their research without the written approval of the author. Specific data obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal concerns. The editorial team conducts appropriate actions in addressing this, such as publication.

Cooperation and Engagement in Publication

The editor will take steps when there is an ethics complaint in the paper. These steps start from contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the claim in objection, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and appropriate actions related to the charge.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS in ARCEE JOURNAL

The Decision of the Editorial Team

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters ARCEE, peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, ARCEE journal does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

Punctuality

The review process in ARCEE generally takes 1-4 months, and if the review process takes longer because of one reason or another, the editor will communicate to the author. The editor team expects the administrative review process, the improvement of the author and the publication of the article, taken out six months.

Confidentiality

Every received article treated as a confidential document. The section may not be discussed with other parties unless permitted by the editorial board.

The review must be objective

The editor team strives to review articles objectively. The results of the analyses have to sharpen the writing, especially in strengthening the results and discussion of the research objectives so that it can support the improvement of the article.

Source / Reference Recognition

The reviewer should identify relevant research that will be published that there is no plagiarism by the author. The reviewer must observe, explore each statement in the discussion and report by the relevant quote. Reviewers must also provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the articles before the article is published.

SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM

The documents must meet the maximum similarity limit of 20% to proceed to the review process. To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application Ithenticate

Published Feb 29, 2024

https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v5i01.6517

Download

pdf

Statistic

Vol. 5 No. 01 (2024): The Innovation of Sustainable Construction Management

Herry Suryadi Djayaprabha

Department of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, 40141, Indonesia

Wisena Perceka

Department of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, 40141, Indonesia

Angie Oriana

Department of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, 40141, Indonesia

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the bond behavior between fibers and mortar matrix in fiber-reinforced concrete, which was explored through a uniaxial tension test. The bond behavior was studied for different types of embedded fibers: steel fibers, polypropylene fibers, and hybridizations of steel and polypropylene fibers. The mixture proportion was determined based on the absolute volume method with a water-to-binder ratio (w/b) of 0.29 to achieve high-strength mortar. The high-strength mortar was cast by utilizing an industrial waste by-product of both silica fume and fly ash as a partial cement replacement. The compressive strength and uniaxial tension tests on high-strength mortar were conducted at the ages of 28 and 140 days. The long-term bond-strength behavior was investigated at the age of 140 days. The results showed that the average compressive strengths of hardened mortar on 28 and 140 days were 54.82 MPa and 69.37 MPa, respectively. Whereas, the average fiber-mortar bond strengths with steel, polypropylene, and hybridized fibers were 8.62 MPa, 8.37 MPa, and 7.30 MPa, respectively, at 28 days and 11.22 MPa, 10.21 MPa, and 11.82 MPa, respectively, at 140 days. Compared to the equivalent bond strength of the steel fiber, the polypropylene fiber had an equivalent bond strength of 2.90% and 9.00% lower at the ages of 28 and 140 days. Meanwhile, the equivalent bond strength of hybridized fiber was 15.31% lower than that of steel fiber; however, the long-term behavior of the hybridized fiber showed its performance was about 5,35% higher than that of steel fiber at 140 days.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Djayaprabha, H. S., Perceka, W., & Oriana, A. (2024). EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON STEEL AND POLYPROPYLENE FIBERS MORTAR BOND STRENGTH UNDER UNIAXIAL TENSION . Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 5(01), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v5i01.6517

References

Abdallah, S., Fan, M., & Rees, D. W. A. (2018). Bonding Mechanisms and Strength of Steel Fiber–Reinforced Cementitious Composites: Overview. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002154
ASTM C33/C33M-18. (2018). Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. West Conshohocken, ASTM International.
ASTM C109/C109M. (2021). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, ASTM International.
ASTM C128-15. (2015). Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. West Conshohocken, ASTM International.
ASTM C188-16. (2016). Standard Test Method for Density of Hydraulic Cement. West Conshohocken, ASTM International.
ASTM C494-17. (2017). Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. West Conshohocken, ASTM International.
ASTM C1240-20. (2020). Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures. West Conshohocken, ASTM International.
Bhargava, P., Sharma, U. K., & Kaushik, Surendra. K. (2006). Compressive Stress-Strain Behavior of Small Scale Steel Fibre Reinforced High Strength Concrete Cylinders. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 4(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.4.109
Chao, S.-H., Naaman, A. E., & Parra-Montesinos, G. J. (2009). Bond Behavior of Reinforcing Bars in Tensile Strain-Hardening Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites. ACI Structural Journal, 106(06). https://doi.org/10.14359/51663191
Ding, X., Zhao, M., Li, C., Li, J., & Zhao, X. (2021). A multi-index synthetical evaluation of pullout behaviors of hooked-end steel fiber embedded in mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 276, 122219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122219
Fu, C., Guo, R., Lin, Z., Xia, H., Yang, Y., & Ma, Q. (2021). Effect of nano silica and silica fume on the mechanical properties and microstructure of lightweight engineered cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, 298, 123788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123788
Liao, W.-C., Perceka, W., & Liu, E.-J. (2015). Compressive Stress-Strain Relationship of High Strength Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 13(8), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.13.379
Liao, W.-C., Perceka, W., & Yu, L.-C. (2017). Systematic Mix Procedures for Highly Flowable-Strain Hardening Fiber Reinforced Concrete (HF-SHFRC) by Using Tensile Strain Hardening Responses as Performance Criteria. Science of Advanced Materials, 9(7), 1157–1168. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2017.3097
Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Yao, Y., & Huang, Y. (2019). Calculation method for flexural capacity of high strain‐hardening ultra‐high performance concrete T‐beams. Structural Concrete, 20(1), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800151
Naaman, A. E., & Najm, H. (1991). Bond-Slip Mechanisms of Steel Fibers in Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 88(2). https://doi.org/10.14359/1896
Ou, Y.-C., Tsai, M.-S., Liu, K.-Y., & Chang, K.-C. (2012). Compressive Behavior of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with a High Reinforcing Index. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000372
Perceka, W., Liao, W.-C., & Wang, Y. (2016). High Strength Concrete Columns under Axial Compression Load: Hybrid Confinement Efficiency of High Strength Transverse Reinforcement and Steel Fibers. Materials, 9(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040264
Perceka, W., Liao, W.-C., & Wu, Y.-F. (2019). Shear Strength Prediction Equations and Experimental Study of High Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams with Different Shear Span-to-Depth Ratios. Applied Sciences, 9(22), 4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224790
Tavares, L. R. C., Junior, J. F. T., Costa, L. M., da Silva Bezerra, A. C., Cetlin, P. R., & Aguilar, M. T. P. (2020). Influence of quartz powder and silica fume on the performance of Portland cement. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 21461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78567-w
Thomas, J., & Ramaswamy, A. (2007). Mechanical Properties of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(5), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:5(385)
Xu, B. W., Ju, J. W., & Shi, H. S. (2011). Progressive Micromechanical Modeling for Pullout Energy of Hooked-end Steel Fiber in Cement-based Composites. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 20(6), 922–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789510385260



	Published By	: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
	Address	: Jl. Prof. DR. G.A. Siwabessy, Kukusan, Kecamatan Beji, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16424
	Phone	: +62-21-7863532
	E-Mail	: [email protected]
	URL	: http://jurnal.pnj.ac.id/index.php/ARCEE/index

	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

About Journal

FOCUS AND SCOPE

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

PUBLICATION ETHIC

SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References