ANALYSIS OF WASTE MATERIAL COEFFICIENT FOR CONCRETE CASTING WORK USING BIM CUBICOST TAS

Safri .; Tia Octaviani Hermania

doi:10.32722/arcee.v5i01.6067

About Journal

FOCUS AND SCOPE

The proposed articles can come from the fields of material, structure, geotechnical, construction management, water resources, transportation, implementation method, health and safety work in planning, operating, evaluating, maintenance of building, bridge, and environment.

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

The Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

PUBLICATION ETHIC

Publication Ethics Statement

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS ARCEE JOURNAL

Foreword

The ethics of scientific publications in the ARCEE Journal is used to guide that all the writings published in the journal have followed ethical principles in academic publications to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. This paper presents several articles related to the field of science and technology in civil engineering and guidance on ethics in this journal publication (authors, editors, truthful partners, publishers, and readers).

Guidelines on Ethics in Journal Publications

The ARCEE Journal publishes articles from the results of scientific research in the field of civil engineering and environment and has not been edited or in the process of submission in other publications.

The proposed articles can come from the fields of material, structure, geotechnical, construction management, water resources, and environment, transportation, and implementation method & health and safety work in planning, operating, evaluating, and maintenance of building, bridge, and environment.

ARCEE journal is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of an article in building a coherent and recognized network of knowledge about civil engineering and environment. The papers sent to ARCEE Journal must be able to point the quality of the writing of the author. Therefore, it is essential to arrange standards in ethical behavior for all colleague engaged in the publication: authors, editors, partners, publishers, and journal sponsors.

AUTHOR'S ASSIGNMENT in the ARCEE Journal

Standard Article

Articles are original reports of research results and present accurate articles from research conducted by the objectives. The data presented in the paper must be accurate based on research results. Published articles must be adequate and detailed so that they can use as references or references for other researchers. The team editor will not accept presented data, not by ethical behavior in ARCEE Journal.

Plagiarism and Originality

The author has to ensure the article written is the original work of the author himself. If the author enters the results of the research or references from others, the author must admit the name of the author of the article. Plagiarism is an action of imitating and copying all items relating to what is written by another writer and claimed by another author without including the original author. This deed of plagiarism is unethi When Wcal behavior in the publication and not able accepted in Journal ARCEE. Entering the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

The authors and co-authors of the article

The author and co-authors of the article are who has engaged significantly to the concept of writing, those who have contributed to significant contributions registered as co-authors. The author must assure the conformity of the articles with the co-authors before submitting for ARCEE journal.

Errors in Published Articles

When the author discovers a fundamental mistake or inaccuracy in the research that will be published by the ARCEE journal, the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and correct it.

EDITORIAL BOARD OF ASSIGNMENTS in the ARCEE JOURNAL

Publication Decision and Justice in Publication

The editorial team of ARCEE Journal is responsible for deciding which articles publish in ARCEE. Sustainable reviewers work closely with the editorial team in determining which they are eligible to be published in ARCEE journal. Editors and sustainable partners evaluate the articles for content regardless of gender, relatives, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political philosophy of the writer.

Confidentiality of the Process Publication

The Editors and staff editors prevent the leak of author confidentiality and the writing before the article published in ARCEE Journal. The editorial team and editorial staff did not give the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable reviewers to ensure that reviewing in the blinded review paper.

Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Entered articles but not published in ARCEE Journal may not be used by the editorial team in their research without the written approval of the author. Specific data obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal concerns. The editorial team conducts appropriate actions in addressing this, such as publication.

Cooperation and Engagement in Publication

The editor will take steps when there is an ethics complaint in the paper. These steps start from contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the claim in objection, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and appropriate actions related to the charge.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS in ARCEE JOURNAL

The Decision of the Editorial Team

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters ARCEE, peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, ARCEE journal does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

Punctuality

The review process in ARCEE generally takes 1-4 months, and if the review process takes longer because of one reason or another, the editor will communicate to the author. The editor team expects the administrative review process, the improvement of the author and the publication of the article, taken out six months.

Confidentiality

Every received article treated as a confidential document. The section may not be discussed with other parties unless permitted by the editorial board.

The review must be objective

The editor team strives to review articles objectively. The results of the analyses have to sharpen the writing, especially in strengthening the results and discussion of the research objectives so that it can support the improvement of the article.

Source / Reference Recognition

The reviewer should identify relevant research that will be published that there is no plagiarism by the author. The reviewer must observe, explore each statement in the discussion and report by the relevant quote. Reviewers must also provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the articles before the article is published.

SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM

The documents must meet the maximum similarity limit of 20% to proceed to the review process. To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application Ithenticate

Published Feb 29, 2024

https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v5i01.6067

Download

pdf

Statistic

Vol. 5 No. 01 (2024): The Innovation of Sustainable Construction Management

Safri .

Department of Civil Engineering, Jakarta State Polytechnic, Depok, 16425, Indonesia

Tia Octaviani Hermania

Department of Civil Engineering, Jakarta State Polytechnic, Depok, 16425, Indonesia

Abstract

One of the construction project activities that has a large volume of work on the upper structure is casting work. In concrete requirement planning, contractors usually multiply the book by 10%. However, in practice, the concrete requirement is still less than planned. Therefore, concrete requirement planning must be calculated accurately. The volume of concrete needs to be multiplied by the waste material coefficient. This research was conducted on the XYZ Project by directly observing to obtain the volume of realized concrete purchased so that the value of the material coefficient that has taken into account waste material will be obtained. BIM Cubicost TAS is used to minimize planning volume calculation errors. The results of this study show that for horizontal casting work, the largest percentage of residual material is 3.133%, and the average percentage of residual material for horizontal casting is 2.192%. Meanwhile, for vertical casting work, the largest percentage of remaining material is 7.219% and the average percentage of remaining vertical casting material is 3.015%. Finally, the waste material coefficient is obtained as 1.022 for horizontal casting and 1.03 for vertical casting. In the AHSP Ministerial Regulation No. 1 of 2022, the coefficient value of materials for casting work using ready-mix concrete is 1.02. This reveals that the coefficient value in AHSP Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Regulation No. 1 of 2022 has not fully calculated the real waste material in the field. The analyzed coefficient values in this study can be used as a reference for the project to determine coefficients in the AHSP and aid in planning concrete volume requirements because it already takes into account the real waste material in the field.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Safri ., Department of Civil Engineering, Jakarta State Polytechnic, Depok, 16425, Indonesia

Department of Civil Engineering, Jakarta State Polytechnic, Depok, 16425, Indonesia

Tia Octaviani Hermania, Department of Civil Engineering, Jakarta State Polytechnic, Depok, 16425, Indonesia

Department of Civil Engineering, Jakarta State Polytechnic, Depok, 16425, Indonesia

How to Cite

., S., & Hermania, T. O. (2024). ANALYSIS OF WASTE MATERIAL COEFFICIENT FOR CONCRETE CASTING WORK USING BIM CUBICOST TAS . Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 5(01), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v5i01.6067

References

Allo, R. I. G., & Bhaskara, A. (2022). Waste Material Analysis With The Implementation Of Lean Construction. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 18(2), 343-355.
Arif, M. S., Durrotun Nasihien, R., & Sutowijoyo, H. (2021). BIM Implementation in Mall Laves Project Construction Surabaya. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 1(2), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i2.49
Azmi, N., Yi, T. L., Rahmat, M., Hasim, K., Choon, T. T., Hilmi, M., & Abd, I. (2023). The Application Glodon Software During Pre-Contract Stage. 3(1), 190–200.
Baskara, F. (2022). Analisis Biaya Dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Pengecoran Menggunakan Concrete Pump Dan Concrete Bucket (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Lanjutan Gedung Perkuliahan S1 FMIPA UGM). 1–58.
Bilqis, A. N., & Safri, S. (2023). Penggunaan Cubicost Tas Pada Perhitungan Qto Pekerjaan Pengecoran Struktur Konstruksi Gedung. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 446-455).
Devi, K. (2021). Analisis Dan Evaluasi Sisa Material Konstruksi Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Kuliah 4 Lantai Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau. Repository Uir, 1. http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/11085%0Ahttps://repository.uir.ac.id/11085/1/153110856.pdf
Fachlevi, S. R., Ardian, O. H., & Sari, S. N. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Pada Bill Of Quantity Menggunakan Software Autodesk Revit 2022 Dengan Perhitungan Manual Berdasarkan Sni 2847 Tahun 2019 Pada Gedung Serbaguna Di Desa Towangsan. StoragE: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(3), 150-164.
Fariq, N., Ismail, S., & Ab Rani, N. I. (2022). Effective 5D Bim Requirements for Risk Mitigation During Pre-Contract Stage. Journal of Surveying, Construction & Property, 13(2017), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.22452/jscp.sp2022no1.2
Layyinatusshifah, L., Purnomo, A., & Yasinta, R. B. (2023). Analisa Quantity Take Off Arsitektur dalam Penerapan Metode Building Modeling (BIM) Menggunakan Software Autodesk Revit 2023 Pada Pembangunan Graha Pemuda Kompleks Katedral Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 26300-26306.
Hakim, Z., Purnomo, A., & Yasinta, R. B. (2023). Struktur Bangunan Gedung Menggunakan Software Bim Revit (Studi Kasus: Pembangunan Gedung Graha Pemuda Kompleks Katedral Jakarta). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 26292-26299.
Hendra, H., Deni, D., Karsono, B., Olivia, S., & Azhar, A. (2022). Pengenalan Peran Platform Digital Bim (Building Information Modelling) Dalam Program Autodesk Revit Bagi Masyarakat Pelajar Kota Lhokseumawe. Jurnal Solusi Masyarakat Dikara, 2(3), 166-171.
Heryanto, S., & Subroto, G. (2020). Kajian Penerapan Builidng Information Modelling (Bim) Di Industri Jasa Konstruksi Indonesia. Architecture Innovation, 4(2), 193-212.
Okiwijaya, N. S., & Arsyadani, R. (2019). Analisis Dan Evaluasi Waste Material Menggunakan Bim (Building Information Modeling) Pada Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Bangunan Tingkat Tinggi). Repository Unika, 1–76.
PUPR, K. (2022). Pedoman Penyusuanan Perkiraan Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. In Kementrian PUPR.
Sandanayake, M., Bouras, Y., Haigh, R., & Vrcelj, Z. (2020). Current sustainable trends of using waste materials in concrete—a decade review. Sustainability, 12(22), 9622.
Septianugraha, A. F. (2020). Estimasi Indeks Waste Material Konstruksi Untuk Proyek Bangunan Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Frc, Universitas Gadjah Mada). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/36113
Sulistio, H., & Waty, M. (2021). Kerugian Kontraktor Akibat Waste Material Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Bertingkat. PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa, 10(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.22225/pd.10.1.2385.84-98
Suwarni, A., & Anondho, B. (2021). Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Kolom Beton Antara Building Information Modeling (Bim) Dengan Metode Konvensional. JUTEKS (Jurnal Teknik Sipil), 6(2), 75-83.



	Published By	: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
	Address	: Jl. Prof. DR. G.A. Siwabessy, Kukusan, Kecamatan Beji, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16424
	Phone	: +62-21-7863532
	E-Mail	: [email protected]
	URL	: http://jurnal.pnj.ac.id/index.php/ARCEE/index

	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.