Exploring the Potential of Innovation on Rice Straw Fluff (RSF) in Roofing System

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Hassan Ismail
Zamali Omar

Abstract

The metal deck is a building material used on the roof of the house for protection. While rice straw is a plant that forms after the rice is harvested. Rice straws will usually be burned by rice farmers to produce fertile soil; however, this will encourage open burning which can destroy the sustainability of the environment which needs to be avoided. However, there are also many types of metal decks, including metal decks with Polyurethane foam (PU Foam) which are considered good sound absorbers and contain a mixture of chemicals that may be harmful. The existence of Rice Straw Fluff is expected to help those who are less able to get metal decks that are as good as metal decks with Polyurethane foam (PU Foam). Several tests were conducted to detect whether the products produced exceed the effectiveness and can work well. The first test is the Impedance Tube Method which is a method to detect and evaluate the efficient sound frequency level. By using this method, Rice Straw Fluff is tested, and the results and data taken are good and effective if used by consumers. The next test is the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Method (FTIR) which is a method to detect the chemicals contained in Rice Straw Fluff and existing products. The result of this finding clearly shows that rice straw mixed with silicone rubber is alkaline in nature which is influenced by silicone rubber. While Polyurethane foam (PU Foam) is acidic which is influenced by the chemicals mixed to produce foam. Finally, Rice Straw Fluff is an innovative product that can maintain the sustainability of the environment and can help low-income users to get a metal deck that has the same uses and benefits as existing products.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Ismail, H., & Omar, Z. . (2023). Exploring the Potential of Innovation on Rice Straw Fluff (RSF) in Roofing System. Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 4(02), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v4i02.5235

References

  1. Barnard, A. R., & Rao, M. D. (2004). Measurement of sound transmission loss using a modified four-microphone impedance tube. Proceedings of the ASME Noise Control and Acoustics Division (Noise-Con’04).
  2. Bhuvaneshwari, S., Hettiarachchi, H., & Meegoda, J. N. (2019). Crop residue burning in India: policy challenges and potential solutions. International Journal of environmental research and public health, 16(5), 832.
  3. Corredor-Bedoya, A. C., Acuña, B., Serpa, A. L., & Masiero, B. (2021). Effect of the excitation signal type on the absorption coefficient measurement using the impedance tube. Applied Acoustics, 171, 107659.
  4. Hedaoo, N. A., Gupta, L. M., & Ronghe, G. N. (2012). Design of composite slabs with profiled steel decking: a comparison between experimental and analytical studies. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 4, 1-15.
  5. Kadam, K. L., Forrest, L. H., & Jacobson, W. A. (2000). Rice straw as a lignocellulosic resource: collection, processing, transportation, and environmental aspects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 18(5), 369-389.
  6. Koruk, H. (2014). An assessment of the performance of the impedance tube method. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 62(4), 264-274.
  7. Manatrinon, S., Chantaweesomboon, W., Chinrungrueng, J., & Kaemarungsi, K. (2016). Moisture sensor based on standing wave ratio for the agriculture industry. In 2016 7th International Conference of Information and Communication Technology for Embedded Systems (IC-ICTES), 51-56.
  8. McGrory, M., Cirac, D. C., Gaussen, O., Cabrera, D., & Engineers, G. (2012). Sound absorption coefficient measurement: Re-examining the relationship between impedance tube and reverberant room methods. In Proceedings of Acoustics, Fremantle, Australia.
  9. Riaz, T., Zeeshan, R., Zarif, F., Ilyas, K., Muhammad, N., Safi, S. Z., ... & Rehman, I. U. (2018). FTIR analysis of natural and synthetic collagen. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 53(9), 703-746.
  10. Sarier, N., & Onder, E. (2008). Thermal insulation capability of PEG-containing polyurethane foams. Thermochimica Acta, 475(1-2), 15-21.
  11. Seymour, R. B., Mark, H. F., Pauling, L., Fisher, C. H., Stahl, G. A., Sperling, L. H., ... & Carraher, C. E. (1989). Otto Bayer Father of Polyurethanes. Pioneers in Polymer Science, 213-219.
  12. Singh, S. H. I. K. H. A., Singh, R. I. S. H. I. K. E. S. H., Mishra, A. K., Upadhyay, S., Singh, H., & Rahgubanshi, A. S. (2018). Ecological perspectives of crop residue retention under the conservation agriculture systems. Trop Ecol, 59(4), 589-604.
  13. Yan, X., Zhao, Y., Cheng, Q., Zheng, X., & Zhao, Y. (2018). Determining forest duff water content using a low-cost standing wave ratio sensor. Sensors, 18(2), 647.
  14. Yanuartono, Y., Indarjulianto, S., Purnamaningsih, H., Nururrozi, A., & Raharjo, S. (2019). Fermentasi: metode untuk meningkatkan nilai nutrisi jerami padi. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 14(1), 49-60.
  15. Wang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2010). Measuring water content variations in stems by standing wave ratio principle. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation,124-128.