Kinematic Hardening Model Comparison of Square Hollow Section Under Cyclic Bending

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published May 14, 2022
https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v3i02.4530
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 3 No. 02 (2022): System Advantages in Construction

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Aniendhita Rizki Amalia
Department of Advance Industrial Science, Kumamoto University, Japan
Kenshi Ochi
Department of Advance Industrial Science, Kumamoto University, Japan

Abstract

This study compares the different linearity of the kinematic hardening model of the Square Hollow Section (SHS) under cyclic bending loading. Four specimens of a simple support beam cyclically tested in previous research are listed as hot-rolled, hot-finished, and two cold-formed. Using the bilinear, multilinear, and Chaboche models, each specimen is modeled in kinematic hardening. The variables or node sets for each linearity model are estimated using tensile test data, and Chaboche variables are obtained using the least-square fitting method. Each linearity model for each specimen is built-in FEA using a shell model. The numerical model applied the same cyclic loading history as the previous test. The numerical analysis comparison concluded that Chaboche and the multilinear kinematic model generate the expected result fitted to test hysteresis of cold-formed one and cold-formed 2 SHS, but the bilinear models are not fitted. Moreover, all kinematic models are not fit for the hot-rolled and hot-finished SHS compared to the test hysteresis. So, for hot-rolled and hot-finished SHS, the combined hardening is suggested; there is a possibility it is because of the lower yield ratio that both sections have. Overall, during a cyclic bending analysis of cold-formed SHS, multilinear or Chaboche models are preferable if the data is limited.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Amalia, A. R. ., & Ochi, K. (2022). Kinematic Hardening Model Comparison of Square Hollow Section Under Cyclic Bending . Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 3(02), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v3i02.4530

References

  1. ANSYS, I. (2005). Advanced Structural Nonlinearities. ANSYS 9.0., 002205(First Edition).
  2. Ansys inc. (2010). Mechanical APDL Element Reference. 15317(November), 9. http://inside.mines.edu/~apetrell/ENME442/Documents/SOLID187.pdf
  3. Arrayago, I., & Real, E. (2015). Experimental Study on Ferritic Stainless Steel RHS and SHS Cross-sectional Resistance Under Combined Loading. Structures, 4, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.10.003
  4. Bhashyam, G. R. (2002a). ANSYS Mechanical — A Powerful Nonlinear Simulation Tool. September.
  5. Bhashyam, G. R. (2002b). ANSYS Mechanical — A Powerful Nonlinear Simulation Tool (Issue September). ANSYS, Inc.
  6. Bouchenot, T., Felemban, B., Mejia, C., & Gordon, A. P. (2016). Application of Ramberg-Osgood plasticity to determine cyclic hardening parameters. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Power Division (Publication) POWER, 2016-January (June 2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/POWER2016-59317
  7. EN 10210 Hot Finished Structural Hollow Sections of Non-Alloy and Fine Grain Steels, (2006).
  8. EN 10219 Cold-formed welded structural hollow sections of non-alloy and fine grain steels, (2006).
  9. Budaházy, V., & Dunai, L. (2013). Parameter-refreshed Chaboche model for mild steel cyclic plasticity behaviour. Civil Engineering, 57(2), 139–155.
  10. Chaboche, J. L. (1986). Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity. International Journal of Plasticity, 2(2), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(86)90010-0
  11. Chaboche, J. L. (2008). A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theory. International Journal of Plasticity, 24, 1642–1693.
  12. Chaboche, J. L., & Rousselier, G. (1983). On the plastic and viscoplastic constitutive equation. International Journal of Pressure Vessel Piping, 105(2), 153–158.
  13. Chavan, V. B., Nimbalkar, V. N., & Jaiswal, A. P. (2014). Economic Evaluation of Open and Hollow Structural Sections in Industrial Trusses. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 9554–9565.
  14. Crișan, A. (2016). Material Calibration for Static Cyclic Analyses. 13(2), 43–58.
  15. Fadden, M. (2013). Cyclic Bending Behavior of Hollow Structural Sections and their Application in Seismic Moment Frame Systems. 297.
  16. Fadden, M., & McCormick, J. (2014). Finite element model of the cyclic bending behavior of hollow structural sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 94, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.10.021
  17. Fang, H., & Chan, T. M. (2019). Resistance of Axially Loaded Hot-finished S460 and S690 Steel Square Hollow Stub Columns at Elevated Temperatures. Structures, 17(November 2018), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.11.011
  18. Gardner, L., & Yun, X. (2018). Description of stress-strain curves for cold-formed steels. Construction and Building Materials, 189, 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.195
  19. Gardner, L., Yun, X., Macorini, L., & Kucukler, M. (2017). Hot-Rolled Steel and Steel-Concrete Composite Design Incorporating Strain Hardening. Structures, 9, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.08.005
  20. Gkantou, M., Theofanous, M., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2018). Plastic design of hot-finished high strength steel continuous beams. Thin-Walled Structures, 133, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.002
  21. Imaoka, S. (2008). Chaboche Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening Model. Internal Report, (1), 1–15.
  22. Jia, L. J., & Kuwamura, H. (2014). Prediction of cyclic behaviors of mild steel at large plastic strain using coupon test results. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000848
  23. Lakshminarayanan, R., & Technologies, S. M. (2014). CAE Simulation of Non-Linear Analysis - Modeling of Material Model using Isotropic Material Hardening Law Simulation of Non-Linear Analysis in ANSYS Introduction : January 2006. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1202.8167
  24. Lin, J., Zhu, T., & Zhan, L. (2011). Constitutive equations for modelling superplastic forming of metals. In Superplastic Forming of Advanced Metallic Materials. 154–183. Woodhead Publishing.
  25. Ma, J. L., Chan, T. M., & Young, B. (2019). Cold-Formed High-Strength Steel Rectangular and Square Hollow Sections under Combined Compression and Bending. In Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 145(12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002446
  26. Matshusita, K., Iwata, D., & Ochi, K. (2019). Finite Element Analysis of The Cyclic Behavior of Circular Tubular Braces. Proceedings Ofthe 17th International Symposium on Tubular Structures., 574–581. https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-11-0745-0 083-cd 5740
  27. Meng, X., & Gardner, L. (2020). Testing of hot-finished high strength steel SHS and RHS under combined compression and bending. Thin-Walled Structures, 148(June 2019), 106262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106262
  28. Nagai, T., & Ochi, K. (2019). Influence of material on inelastic behaviour and local buckling of SHS Members under cyclic loading. Nordic Steel Copenhagen, 3(3–4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.1090
  29. Nip, K. H., Gardner, L., Davies, C. M., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2010). Extremely low cycle fatigue tests on structural carbon steel and stainless steel. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.08.004
  30. Patillo, P. D. (2018). Yield and Inelastic Behavior. In Elements of Oil and Gas Well Tubular Design. 151–195. Gulf Professional Publishing. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811769-9.00006-2
  31. Resapu, R., & Perumahanthi, L. R. (2020). Numerical study of bilinear isotropic & kinematic elastic–plastic response under cyclic loading. Materials Today: Proceedings, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.812
  32. Terada, S., Ochi, K., Nagaoka, T., Structures, T., Gardner, X. I. V, & Terada, S. (2012). Rotation capacity and ductility of square hollow sections : A comparison between cold-formed and hot-finished sections. The 13th International Symposium of Tubular Structure, 765–771.
  33. Tsuchiya, K., & Ochi, K. (2016). Behavior of rectangular HSS members under cyclic loading -A comparison between cold-formed , hot-rolled and hot-finished sections.
  34. Wang, J., Afshan, S., Gkantou, M., Theofanous, M., Baniotopoulos, C., & Gardner, L. (2016a). Flexural behaviour of hot-finished high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 121(June), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.017
  35. Wang, J., Afshan, S., Gkantou, M., Theofanous, M., Baniotopoulos, C., & Gardner, L. (2016b). Flexural behaviour of hot-finished high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 121, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.017
  36. Wu, H., Meggiolaro, M. A., & de Castro, J. T. P. (2016). Computational implementation of a non-linear kinematic hardening formulation for tension–torsion multiaxial fatigue calculations. International Journal of Fatigue, 91, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.005
  37. Yun, X., & Gardner, L. (2017). Stress-strain curves for hot-rolled steels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 133(September), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.024
  38. Yun, X., Wang, Z., & Gardner, L. (2020). Structural performance and design of hot-rolled steel SHS and RHS under combined axial compression and bending. Structures, 27(June), 1289–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.06.038
  39. Zhao, O., Gardner, L., & Young, B. (2016). Behaviour and design of stainless steel SHS and RHS beam-columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 106, 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.04.018