Couple Construction Model as an Alternative of Improvement Method Due to Failure and Defect of Cohesion Parameter (C)

Mustaffa Anjang Ahmad; Putera Agung Maha Agung; Yuwono Yuwono; Saiful Azhar Ahmad Tajudin

doi:10.32722/arcee.v2i02.3113

About Journal

FOCUS AND SCOPE

The proposed articles can come from the fields of material, structure, geotechnical, construction management, water resources, transportation, implementation method, health and safety work in planning, operating, evaluating, maintenance of building, bridge, and environment.

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

The Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

PUBLICATION ETHIC

Publication Ethics Statement

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS ARCEE JOURNAL

Foreword

The ethics of scientific publications in the ARCEE Journal is used to guide that all the writings published in the journal have followed ethical principles in academic publications to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. This paper presents several articles related to the field of science and technology in civil engineering and guidance on ethics in this journal publication (authors, editors, truthful partners, publishers, and readers).

Guidelines on Ethics in Journal Publications

The ARCEE Journal publishes articles from the results of scientific research in the field of civil engineering and environment and has not been edited or in the process of submission in other publications.

The proposed articles can come from the fields of material, structure, geotechnical, construction management, water resources, and environment, transportation, and implementation method & health and safety work in planning, operating, evaluating, and maintenance of building, bridge, and environment.

ARCEE journal is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of an article in building a coherent and recognized network of knowledge about civil engineering and environment. The papers sent to ARCEE Journal must be able to point the quality of the writing of the author. Therefore, it is essential to arrange standards in ethical behavior for all colleague engaged in the publication: authors, editors, partners, publishers, and journal sponsors.

AUTHOR'S ASSIGNMENT in the ARCEE Journal

Standard Article

Articles are original reports of research results and present accurate articles from research conducted by the objectives. The data presented in the paper must be accurate based on research results. Published articles must be adequate and detailed so that they can use as references or references for other researchers. The team editor will not accept presented data, not by ethical behavior in ARCEE Journal.

Plagiarism and Originality

The author has to ensure the article written is the original work of the author himself. If the author enters the results of the research or references from others, the author must admit the name of the author of the article. Plagiarism is an action of imitating and copying all items relating to what is written by another writer and claimed by another author without including the original author. This deed of plagiarism is unethi When Wcal behavior in the publication and not able accepted in Journal ARCEE. Entering the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

The authors and co-authors of the article

The author and co-authors of the article are who has engaged significantly to the concept of writing, those who have contributed to significant contributions registered as co-authors. The author must assure the conformity of the articles with the co-authors before submitting for ARCEE journal.

Errors in Published Articles

When the author discovers a fundamental mistake or inaccuracy in the research that will be published by the ARCEE journal, the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and correct it.

EDITORIAL BOARD OF ASSIGNMENTS in the ARCEE JOURNAL

Publication Decision and Justice in Publication

The editorial team of ARCEE Journal is responsible for deciding which articles publish in ARCEE. Sustainable reviewers work closely with the editorial team in determining which they are eligible to be published in ARCEE journal. Editors and sustainable partners evaluate the articles for content regardless of gender, relatives, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political philosophy of the writer.

Confidentiality of the Process Publication

The Editors and staff editors prevent the leak of author confidentiality and the writing before the article published in ARCEE Journal. The editorial team and editorial staff did not give the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable reviewers to ensure that reviewing in the blinded review paper.

Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Entered articles but not published in ARCEE Journal may not be used by the editorial team in their research without the written approval of the author. Specific data obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal concerns. The editorial team conducts appropriate actions in addressing this, such as publication.

Cooperation and Engagement in Publication

The editor will take steps when there is an ethics complaint in the paper. These steps start from contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the claim in objection, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and appropriate actions related to the charge.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS in ARCEE JOURNAL

The Decision of the Editorial Team

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters ARCEE, peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, ARCEE journal does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

Punctuality

The review process in ARCEE generally takes 1-4 months, and if the review process takes longer because of one reason or another, the editor will communicate to the author. The editor team expects the administrative review process, the improvement of the author and the publication of the article, taken out six months.

Confidentiality

Every received article treated as a confidential document. The section may not be discussed with other parties unless permitted by the editorial board.

The review must be objective

The editor team strives to review articles objectively. The results of the analyses have to sharpen the writing, especially in strengthening the results and discussion of the research objectives so that it can support the improvement of the article.

Source / Reference Recognition

The reviewer should identify relevant research that will be published that there is no plagiarism by the author. The reviewer must observe, explore each statement in the discussion and report by the relevant quote. Reviewers must also provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the articles before the article is published.

SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM

The documents must meet the maximum similarity limit of 20% to proceed to the review process. To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application Ithenticate

Published Feb 28, 2021

https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v2i02.3113

Download

PDF

Statistic

Vol. 2 No. 02 (2021): Variety of Case Study

Mustaffa Anjang Ahmad

Department of Infrastructure And Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, 86400, MALAYSIA

Putera Agung Maha Agung

State Polytechnic of Jakarta (PNJ)

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3136-0714

Yuwono Yuwono

Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Kota Depok, 16424, Indonesia

Saiful Azhar Ahmad Tajudin

Department of Infrastructure And Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, 86400, MALAYSIA

Abstract

Road or highway system as an important part for development infrastructure program is a very critical and crucial problem for increasing the people's economic resources. Traffic of people and goods would have some disturbances if the road service damaged. One of main problems out of order the road is a groundwater movement in uncontrolled condition at study area. Therefore, a method of ground improvement has to be implemented at the road margin area. This study is going to focus on a couple model of construction systems implemented to avoid all slope sliding factors. From some laboratory and field data observations, clay layers as soil foundation during the road life time service plan at the study site indicated that there were some reductions of soil shear strength due to cohesion (c) values decreased. Fast alteration of water content (w) was the main cause of failure and defect of cohesion parameter, especially for expansive soil layers. From stability analysis using some geotechnical data and calculated by PLAXIS application software, the existing slope sliding was found in unsafe condition with safety factor (SF) ≤ 1.25. However, one option of design criteria using a couple construction model was obtained the better of safety factor with (SF) > 1.25.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Mustaffa Anjang Ahmad, Department of Infrastructure And Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, 86400, MALAYSIA

Infrastructure And Geomatic Engineering

Putera Agung Maha Agung, State Polytechnic of Jakarta (PNJ)

Geotechnical Engineering; Plumbing Installation

Yuwono Yuwono, Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Kota Depok, 16424, Indonesia

Geotechnical Engineering

Saiful Azhar Ahmad Tajudin, Department of Infrastructure And Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, 86400, MALAYSIA

Infrastructure And Geomatic Engineering

How to Cite

Ahmad, M. A., Agung, P. A. M., Yuwono, Y., & Ahmad Tajudin, S. A. (2021). Couple Construction Model as an Alternative of Improvement Method Due to Failure and Defect of Cohesion Parameter (C). Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 2(02), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.32722/arcee.v2i02.3113

References

BRE. (1996). Desiccation in clay soils. BRE Digest, 412(12). CRC, London.
Bowles, L. E. (1996). Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-hill.
Chen, F. H. (1988). Foundations on expansive soils. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Driscoll, R. (1983). The influence of vegetation on the swelling and shrinking of clay soils in Britain. Geotechnique, 33(2), 93-105.
Delage, P., & Lefebvre, G. (1984). Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and of its evolution during consolidation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21(1), 21-35.
Coduto, D.P. Kitch,. W.A., Yeung, M.C.R. (1994). Foundation Design: Principles and Practices (3rd Edition). Prentice Hall. p. 984.
Doran, I. G., McKinley, J. D., Day, R. A., & Morris, P. H. (2006). Discussion: Determination of the coefficient of consolidation using a least squares method. Géotechnique, 56(1), 73-76.
Gromko, G. J. (1974). Review of expansive soils. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 100(6), 667-687.
Hasan, M. F. R., Swastika, T. W., Martina, N., & Wulandari, L. S. (2019). Identification of Groundwater Distribution Using Self Potential Method. Applied Research on Civil Engineering and Environment (ARCEE), 1(01), 16-23.
Holtz, W. G., & Gibbs, H. J. (1956). Engineering properties of expansive clays. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 121(1), 641-663.
Orense, R., Mirjafari, Y., & Suemasa, N. (2013). Geotechnical site characterisation using Screw Driving Sounding method.
Peta Infrastruktur Kabupaten Tangerang. 2017. Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR).
Sujatmika & Santosa, S. (1992). Geological Map of The Leuwidamar Quadrangle, Jawa. Bandung: Geological Research and Development Centre.
Peraturan Menteri Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Mitigasi Bencana Alam Bidang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman.
Seed, H. B., Woodward, R. J., & Lundgren, R. (1963). Prediction of swelling potential for compacted clays. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 128(1), 1443-1477.
Seed, H. B., Woodward, R. J., & Lundgren, R. (1963). Prediction of swelling potential for compacted clays. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 128(1), 1443-1477.
SNI 6425:2015. Metode uji indeks ekspansi tanah Standard test method for expansion index of soils (ASTM D 482908a, IDT). ICS. 93. 020. Pusat Litbang SDA.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanggulangan Bencana, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 66, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4723.
Van der Merwe, D. H. (1964). The prediction of heave from the plasticity index and percentage clay fraction of soils. Civil Engineering= Siviele Ingenieurswese, 1964(6), 103-107.



	Published By	: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
	Address	: Jl. Prof. DR. G.A. Siwabessy, Kukusan, Kecamatan Beji, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16424
	Phone	: +62-21-7863532
	E-Mail	: [email protected]
	URL	: http://jurnal.pnj.ac.id/index.php/ARCEE/index

	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.