PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA DIVISI KESEKRETARIATAN PT PLN (PERSERO) DISTRIBUSI JAKARTA RAYA DAN TANGERANG

Megido Andreas; Maswir Maswir; Mawarta Onida

doi:10.32722/epi.v14i1.959

About Journal

Focus and Scope

The proposed articles can come from the fields of languages, social sciences, cultures, and education.

Peer Review Process

Peer-reviewers assist the editors in making decisions to accept or reject articles that enter EPIGRAM (e-journal), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blind review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It aims to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by a reviewer using track change in the article. All comments and suggestions from the reviewers are written using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer teams in communicating the results of the review. Thus, EPIGRAM (e-journal) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewers to the editorial team.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its contents on the principle to make research freely available to the public in order to support a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics Statement

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Foreword

The ethics of scientific publications in EPIGRAM (e-journal) is used to guide that all the writings published in the journal have followed ethical principles in academic publications to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. This paper presents several articles related to the field of language, social science, culture, and education on ethics in this journal publication (authors, editors, truthful partners, publishers, and readers).

Guidelines on Ethics in Journal Publications

EPIGRAM (e-journal) publishes articles from the results of scientific research in the field of language, social science, culture, education and has not been edited or in the process of submission in other publications.

The proposed articles can come from the fields of languages, social sciences, cultures, and education.

EPIGRAM (e-journal) is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of an article in building a coherent and recognized network of knowledge about languages, social sciences, cultures, and education. The papers sent to EPIGRAM (e-journal) must be able to point the quality of the writing of the author. Therefore, it is essential to arrange standards in ethical behavior for all colleague engaged in the publication: authors, editors, partners, publishers, and journal sponsors.

AUTHOR'S ASSIGNMENT

Standard Article

Articles are original reports of research results and present accurate articles from research conducted by the objectives. The data presented in the paper must be accurate based on research results. Published articles must be adequate and detailed so that they can use as references or references for other researchers. The team editor will not accept presented data, not by ethical behavior in EPIGRAM (e-journal).

Plagiarism and Originality

The author has to ensure the article written is the original work of the author himself. If the author enters the results of the research or references from others, the author must admit the name of the author of the article. Plagiarism is an action of imitating and copying all items relating to what is written by another writer and claimed by another author without including the original author. This deed of plagiarism is unethical behavior in the publication and not able accepted in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Entering the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

The Authors and Co-authors of the Article

The author and co-authors of the article are who has engaged significantly to the concept of writing, those who have contributed to significant contributions registered as co-authors. The author must assure the conformity of the articles with the co-authors before submitting for EPIGRAM (e-journal).

Errors in Published Articles

When the author discovers a fundamental mistake or inaccuracy in the research that will be published by the EPIGRAM (e-journal), the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and correct it.

EDITORIAL BOARD OF ASSIGNMENTS

Publication Decision and Justice in Publication

The editorial team of EPIGRAM (e-journal) is responsible for deciding which articles publish in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Sustainable reviewers work closely with the editorial team in determining which they are eligible to be published in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Editors and sustainable partners evaluate the articles for content regardless of gender, relatives, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political philosophy of the writer.

Confidentiality of the Process Publication

The Editors and staff editors prevent the leak of author confidentiality and the writing before the article published in EPIGRAM (e-journal). The editorial team and editorial staff did not give the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable reviewers to ensure that reviewing in the blinded review paper.

Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Entered articles but not published in EPIGRAM (e-journal) may not be used by the editorial team in their research without the written approval of the author. Specific data obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal concerns. The editorial team conducts appropriate actions in addressing this, such as publication.

Cooperation and Engagement in Publication

The editor will take steps when there is an ethics complaint in the paper. These steps start from contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the claim in objection, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and appropriate actions related to the charge.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

The Decision of the Editorial Team

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters EPIGRAM (e-journal), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, EPIGRAM (e-journal) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

Punctuality

The review process in EPIGRAM (e-journal) generally takes 1-4 months, and if the review process takes longer because of one reason or another, the editor will communicate to the author. The editor team expects the administrative review process, the improvement of the author and the publication of the article, taken out six months.

Confidentiality

Every received article treated as a confidential document. The section may not be discussed with other parties unless permitted by the editorial board.

The Review Must be Objective

The editor team strives to review articles objectively. The results of the analyses have to sharpen the writing, especially in strengthening the results and discussion of the research objectives so that it can support the improvement of the article.

Source / Reference Recognition

The reviewer should identify relevant research that will be published that there is no plagiarism by the author. The reviewer must observe, explore each statement in the discussion and report by the relevant quote. Reviewers must also provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the articles before the article is published.

Screening For Plagiarism

The documents must meet the maximum similarity limit of 20% to proceed to the review process. To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application Ithenticate

Published Nov 20, 2017

https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v14i1.959

Download

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Statistic

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017)

Megido Andreas

Administrasi Bisnis Terapan, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Maswir Maswir

Administrasi Bisnis Terapan, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Mawarta Onida

Administrasi Bisnis Terapan, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze and determine the performance of employees in the Secretariat Division of PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Jakarta and Tangerang using motivational variables are analyzed based on the theory of intrinsic motivation, according to Herzberg two-factor theory. This research was conducted to measure employee performance using several indicators, including the number (quantity) of work, quality of work, precision time, attendance, and cooperation ability. The method used in this research is the quantitative method with survey research and data collection through a questionnaire to the respondent. Processing data using a data analysis tool named SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 21. The samples used in this study as many as 23 people. Based on the calculation simple linear regression analysis obtained regression equation Y = 5.113 + 0,894X. From the calculation of the coefficient of determination the influence of work motivation (Variable X) on the performance (Variable Y) is equal to 0.413 or 41.3%, while the remaining 0.587 or 58.7% is influenced by independent variables studied were: job satisfaction, stress, trust, justice, ethics, training and decision-making. From the calculation of significance test (partial test) can be obtained values (t count > t table), i.e. 3.844 > 1.721 that means Ha accepted and Ho rejected, so the hypothesis are "There is a positive and significant influence between Work Motivation and Employees Performance at Secretariat Division of PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Jakarta and Tangerang" which means that the hypothesis can be accepted.

Key words: Performance, Work Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui kinerja pegawai pada Divisi Kesekretariatan PT PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya dan Tangerang dengan menggunakan variabel motivasi yang dianalisis berdasarkan teori motivasi intrinsik, menurut teori dua faktor Herzberg. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mengukur kinerja pegawai dengan menggunakan beberapa indikator, diantaranya jumlah (kuantitas) pekerjaan, kualitas pekerjaan, ketepatan waktu, kehadiran, dan kemampuan kerja sama. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode kuantitatif dengan penelitian survei serta pengumpulan data melalui kusioner ke responden. Pengolahan data dengan menggunakan alat bantu analisis data yaitu SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) versi 21. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 23 orang. Berdasarkan pada perhitungan analisis regresi linear sederhana didapat persamaan regresi Y = 5,113 + 0,894X. Dari hasil perhitungan koefisien determinasi besarnya pengaruh motivasi kerja (Variabel X) terhadap kinerja (Variabel Y) adalah sebesar 0,413 atau 41,3%, sedangkan sisanya sebesar 0,587 atau 58,7% dipengaruhi oleh variabel bebas yang diteliti yaitu: kepuasan kerja, stress, kepercayaan, keadilan, etika, pelatihan dan pengambilan keputusan. Dari hasil perhitungan uji signifikansi (uji parsial) dapat diperoleh nilai (t hitung > t tabel) yaitu 3,844 > 1,721 berarti Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak, sehingga hipotesis yang didapat adalah “Terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara Motivasi Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai pada Divisi Kesekretariatan PT. PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya dan Tangerang.” yang berarti hipotesis tersebut dapat diterima.

Kata kunci: Kinerja, Motivasi Kerja, Motivasi Intrinsik

How to Cite

Andreas, M., Maswir, M., & Onida, M. (2017). PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA DIVISI KESEKRETARIATAN PT PLN (PERSERO) DISTRIBUSI JAKARTA RAYA DAN TANGERANG. EPIGRAM (e-Journal), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v14i1.959

References

Buku:
Arep, Ishak dan Hendri Tanjung. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Universitas Trisakti.
Bangun, Wilson. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Erlangga.
Colquit, Jason A., A. Lepine, and Michael J. Wesson. 2009. Organizational Behavior Improving Performance, Commitment in the Work Place, Second Edition. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Dessler, Gary. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Kesepuluh. Jakarta : PT. Indeks.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Husein, Umar. 2001. Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis Edisi 11. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kountur, Ronny. 2009. Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi. Jakarta : Percetakan Buana Printing.
Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu A.A. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noor, Juliansyah. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Robbins, Stephen P & Mary Coulter. 2007. Manajemen, Edisi-8, Jilid 2, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Terry, George dan Leslie W. Rue. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen, Cetakan Kesebelas. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Sanusi, Anwar. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Siagian, Sondang P. Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta.
Siregar, Syofian. 2010. Statistik Deferentif untuk Penelitian. Jakarta : Rajawali Press.
Sperling, Abraham. 1987. “Psycology : Made Simple”. New York : Mc. Graw Hill Interational.
Stanford, Fillmore H. 1969. Human Resource Management, Fourteenth Edition. New York : Mc. Graw Hill International.
Stanton, William J. 1981. Fundamentals of Marketing. New York : Mc. Graw Hill International.
Sudjana. 2000, Statistik untuk Ekonomi dan Niaga. Bandung : Tarsito.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung : Alfabeta.
------------. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung : Alfabeta.
Sutrisno, Eddy. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Prenada Media (Kencana).
Jurnal:
Agusta, Leonardo dan Eddy Madiono Sutanto. 2013. ”Pengaruh Pelatihan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan CV Haragon Surabaya”. Surabaya : Universitas Kristen Petra.
Murti, Harry dan Veronika Agustini Srimulyani. 2013. “Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dengan Variabel Pemediasi Kepuasan Kerja Pada PDAM Kota Madiun”. Madiun : Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Madiun.
Sungkono, Rachmat Hasbullah, Herru Bambang Rumansyah. 2011. “Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Outlet PT. Sinarmas Multifinance Cabang Telagasari, Karawang”. Karawang : Jurnal Manajemen.
Publikasi Elektronik:
http://www.pln.co.id/disjaya/?p=62 di akses pada 08 Agustus 2016



	Published By	: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
	Address	: Jl. Prof. DR. G.A. Siwabessy, Kukusan, Kecamatan Beji, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16424
	Phone	: +62-21-7863532
	E-Mail	: [email protected]
	URL	: https://jurnal.pnj.ac.id/index.php/epigram/index

	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

About Journal

Focus and Scope

Peer Review Process

Open Access Policy

Publication Ethic

Screening For Plagiarism

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References