MODEL KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DAERAH DALAM MEWUJUDKAN MASYARAKAT SEJAHTERA

Nining Latianingsih; Dewi Winarni Susyanti; Iis Mariam

doi:10.32722/epi.v16i1.1248

About Journal

Focus and Scope

The proposed articles can come from the fields of languages, social sciences, cultures, and education.

Peer Review Process

Peer-reviewers assist the editors in making decisions to accept or reject articles that enter EPIGRAM (e-journal), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blind review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It aims to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by a reviewer using track change in the article. All comments and suggestions from the reviewers are written using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer teams in communicating the results of the review. Thus, EPIGRAM (e-journal) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewers to the editorial team.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its contents on the principle to make research freely available to the public in order to support a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics Statement

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Foreword

The ethics of scientific publications in EPIGRAM (e-journal) is used to guide that all the writings published in the journal have followed ethical principles in academic publications to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts. This paper presents several articles related to the field of language, social science, culture, and education on ethics in this journal publication (authors, editors, truthful partners, publishers, and readers).

Guidelines on Ethics in Journal Publications

EPIGRAM (e-journal) publishes articles from the results of scientific research in the field of language, social science, culture, education and has not been edited or in the process of submission in other publications.

The proposed articles can come from the fields of languages, social sciences, cultures, and education.

EPIGRAM (e-journal) is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of an article in building a coherent and recognized network of knowledge about languages, social sciences, cultures, and education. The papers sent to EPIGRAM (e-journal) must be able to point the quality of the writing of the author. Therefore, it is essential to arrange standards in ethical behavior for all colleague engaged in the publication: authors, editors, partners, publishers, and journal sponsors.

AUTHOR'S ASSIGNMENT

Standard Article

Articles are original reports of research results and present accurate articles from research conducted by the objectives. The data presented in the paper must be accurate based on research results. Published articles must be adequate and detailed so that they can use as references or references for other researchers. The team editor will not accept presented data, not by ethical behavior in EPIGRAM (e-journal).

Plagiarism and Originality

The author has to ensure the article written is the original work of the author himself. If the author enters the results of the research or references from others, the author must admit the name of the author of the article. Plagiarism is an action of imitating and copying all items relating to what is written by another writer and claimed by another author without including the original author. This deed of plagiarism is unethical behavior in the publication and not able accepted in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Entering the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

The Authors and Co-authors of the Article

The author and co-authors of the article are who has engaged significantly to the concept of writing, those who have contributed to significant contributions registered as co-authors. The author must assure the conformity of the articles with the co-authors before submitting for EPIGRAM (e-journal).

Errors in Published Articles

When the author discovers a fundamental mistake or inaccuracy in the research that will be published by the EPIGRAM (e-journal), the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and correct it.

EDITORIAL BOARD OF ASSIGNMENTS

Publication Decision and Justice in Publication

The editorial team of EPIGRAM (e-journal) is responsible for deciding which articles publish in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Sustainable reviewers work closely with the editorial team in determining which they are eligible to be published in EPIGRAM (e-journal). Editors and sustainable partners evaluate the articles for content regardless of gender, relatives, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political philosophy of the writer.

Confidentiality of the Process Publication

The Editors and staff editors prevent the leak of author confidentiality and the writing before the article published in EPIGRAM (e-journal). The editorial team and editorial staff did not give the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable reviewers to ensure that reviewing in the blinded review paper.

Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Entered articles but not published in EPIGRAM (e-journal) may not be used by the editorial team in their research without the written approval of the author. Specific data obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal concerns. The editorial team conducts appropriate actions in addressing this, such as publication.

Cooperation and Engagement in Publication

The editor will take steps when there is an ethics complaint in the paper. These steps start from contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the claim in objection, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and appropriate actions related to the charge.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

The Decision of the Editorial Team

Peer-reviews assists the editor in making decisions to be accepted or rejected by an article that enters EPIGRAM (e-journal), peer-reviewed (a sustainable partner) to conduct a blinded review and evaluation of papers that are reasonable in authors expertise. The reviewers do not know the author's name and the name of the author's institution as blind-review. It means to avoid conflicts of interest and to assure the quality of the paper.

Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the article. All comments, suggestions, and reviewers' comments are written by using track change. It is to facilitate the editor and writer team in communicating the results of the review. Thus, EPIGRAM (e-journal) does not require any other form to deliver the results of the report from the reviewer to the editorial team.

Punctuality

The review process in EPIGRAM (e-journal) generally takes 1-4 months, and if the review process takes longer because of one reason or another, the editor will communicate to the author. The editor team expects the administrative review process, the improvement of the author and the publication of the article, taken out six months.

Confidentiality

Every received article treated as a confidential document. The section may not be discussed with other parties unless permitted by the editorial board.

The Review Must be Objective

The editor team strives to review articles objectively. The results of the analyses have to sharpen the writing, especially in strengthening the results and discussion of the research objectives so that it can support the improvement of the article.

Source / Reference Recognition

The reviewer should identify relevant research that will be published that there is no plagiarism by the author. The reviewer must observe, explore each statement in the discussion and report by the relevant quote. Reviewers must also provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the articles before the article is published.

Screening For Plagiarism

The documents must meet the maximum similarity limit of 20% to proceed to the review process. To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application Ithenticate

Published Jul 10, 2019

https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v16i1.1248

Download

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Statistic

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019)

Nining Latianingsih

Jurusan Administrasi Niaga Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Dewi Winarni Susyanti

Jurusan Administrasi Niaga Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Iis Mariam

Jurusan Administrasi Niaga Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges experienced by developing countries is the emergence of environmental problems that can not be separated from economic development. This can be illustrated in the relationship between the increase in population and the increasing tarap of community life on the one hand can support economic growth and on the other hand can also lead to a decline in development The problem of waste management is one aspect of development that is very important and requires the involvement between government, business / private, colleges and the general public. While the formulation of the problem of how the policy and the concept of waste management in urban areas, How to solve the problem of waste in the community in the city of Depok, What obstacles that cause the management and processing of waste in the city of Depok has not run well. The method that will be used in this research is using qualitative descriptive research method and passed by through stages, that is mapping of local waste treatment policy, evaluating the processing of garbage area. One of the goals of local government is to minimize waste. While the targets achieved from this research is the model of waste management dilaksaakan by local government of Depok city can realize a clean life, environmentally friendly and organized waste processing and improve the economy of society. The resulting model of research, in order to be implemented in accordance with the mandate of the respective regional regulations and impact on waste reduction and economic improvement of the community.

Keywords: local policy, waste processing, economic improvement of society, domestic waste pollution, evaluation of local waste.

Abstrak

Salah satu tantangan terberat yang dialami oleh negara berkembang adalah timbulnya permasalahan lingkungan yang tidak bisa terlepas dari pembangunan ekonomi. Hal ini dapat diilustrasikan dalam hubungan antara kenaikan jumlah penduduk dan meningkatnya tarap hidup masyarakat yang disatu sisi dapat menunjang pertumbuhan ekonomi dan di sisi lain juga dapat menimbulkan penurunan pembangunan Masalah pengelolaan sampah merupakan salah satu aspek dalam pembangunan yang sangat penting dan memerlukan keterlibatan antara pemerintah, bisnis/swasta, perguruan tinggi dan masyarakat umum. Sedangkan perumusan masalah bagaimana kebijakan serta konsep pengelolaan sampah di perkotaan, Bagaimana mengatasi masalah sampah pada masyarakat di kabupaten Bogor, Hambatan apa yang menyebabkan pengelolaan serta pengolahan sampah di kabupaten Bogor belum berjalan dengan baik. Metode yang akan dipakai dalampencapai penelitian ini adalahmenggunakanmetode penelitian deskriptif kualitattif dan dilalui dengan melalui tahapan-tahapan, yaitu mapping kebijakan pengolahan sampah daerah,mengevaluasi pengolahan sampah daerah. Salah satu tujuan dari pemerintah daerah adalah untuk meminimalisir sampah. Sedangkan target yang dicapai dari penelitian ini adalah model pengelolaan sampah yang dilaksaakan oleh pemerintah daerah kabupaten Bogor, dapat mewujudkan kehidupan sejahtera, bersih, ramah lingkungan serta tertata pengolahan sampahnya dan meningkatkan ekonomi masyarakat. Model yang dihasilkan dari penelitian, agar dapat diterapkan sesuai dengan amanat dari peraturan daerah masing-masing dan berdampak pada pengurangan sampah dan peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat.

Kata kunci: kebijakan daerah, Pengolahan sampah, peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat, pencemaran limbah domestik, evaluasi sampah daerah

How to Cite

Latianingsih, N., Susyanti, D. W., & Mariam, I. (2019). MODEL KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DAERAH DALAM MEWUJUDKAN MASYARAKAT SEJAHTERA. EPIGRAM (e-Journal), 16(1). https://doi.org/10.32722/epi.v16i1.1248

References

Badan perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional 2010. Buku Potensi Ekonomi
Enviromental Service Program (ESP) DKI. 2006. Modul Pelatihan Pengelolaan Sampah Ber-basis Masyarakat.
Faizah. 2008. Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga Berbasis Masyarakat (Studi Kasus di Kota Yogyakarta). Tesis Magister Ilmu Ling-kungan. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang
Komang Ayu, Ni. 2009. Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tang-ga (Studi Kasus di Sampangan dan Jom-blang, Kota Semarang). Tesis Magister Ilmu Lingkungan. Universitas Diponegoro. Se-marang.
Purdiyanto. 2009. Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam penanganan Sampah untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Lingkungan. Laporan Penelitian Ke-sehatan Lingkungan dan Kerja.
Surbakti, Sriliani. 2009. Potensi Pengelolaan .Sampah Menuju Zero Waste yang Berbasis Masyarakat di Kecamatan Kedungkandang Kota Malang. Laporan Penelitian Institut Teknologi Surabaya.
Salim, Emil. 23 Juni, 2005. Hidup Dari Sampah, Belajar dari Prof Hasan Poerbo.Harian Kompas.
http://hasanpoerbo.blogspot.com/2006/04/hi dup-dari-sampah-belajar-dari-prof.html [14 Maret 2010].
Najmudin Ramli. 2007. Pariwisata berwawasan lingkungan. Jakarta
Scheyvens, R., & Mornsen, J. H. (2008). Tourism and poverty reduction: issues for small island states. Tourism Geographies, 10(1), 22e41.
Yoeti Oka. 1996. Pengantar ilmu Pariwisata. Bandung : Penerbit Angkasa
Latianingsih,nining. 2010. Implementasi hokum bisnis melalui kegiatan koperasi sampah dalam rangka pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis PNJ.
Jurnal triwulan Pembangunan Daerah No.02 tahun 2006
Umar, Ibnu. 2009. Pengelolaan Sampah Secara Terpadu di Wilayah Perkotaan. Jurnal Ling-kungan Hidup.
M. Jaafar, S.A. Maideen. School of Housing Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, 11800 Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia / Tourism Management 33 (2012) 683e691 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tourman
Medlik, S., & Middleton, V. T. C. (1973). Product formulation in tourism. In. Tourism and marketing, Vol. 13. Berne: AISET.
Anonim, 2008. Olah Sampah, http://www.pusdakota, Jakarta



	Published By	: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
	Address	: Jl. Prof. DR. G.A. Siwabessy, Kukusan, Kecamatan Beji, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16424
	Phone	: +62-21-7863532
	E-Mail	: [email protected]
	URL	: https://jurnal.pnj.ac.id/index.php/epigram/index

	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

About Journal

Focus and Scope

Peer Review Process

Open Access Policy

Publication Ethic

Screening For Plagiarism

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References