ANALISIS PENGARUH PENAMBAHAN LIMBAH PAKU TERHADAP SIFAT MEKANIS BETON NORMAL

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 5, 2023
https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v4i3.4772
Download
ANALISIS PENGARUH PENAMBAHAN LIMBAH PAKU TERHADAP SIFAT MEKANIS BETON NORMAL
Statistic
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Construction and Material Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 November 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Teuku Muhammad Bhima
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
Muhtarom Riyadi
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
Lilis Tiyani
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

The use of steel fibres as a concrete mixture can prevent cracks due to loading, the heat of hydration, and shrinkage. However, the availability of steel fibre is still limited, and it is expensive enough that alternative materials are required, which may reduce the economic value. This research aims to analyse the effect of an easy-to-find alternative material, namely plywood nail waste, on the properties of normal concrete. Concrete properties tests include compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus of elasticity. This research was conducted by mixing concrete with nail waste material with variations of 0%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% of the weight of the concrete. Concrete samples in the shapes of cylinders and beams are required for this study.  The results showed that using nail waste can reduce the compressive strength of 28-day-old concrete and the modulus of elasticity as the variation of the nail waste increases. However, the use of nail waste in certain variations can increase the split tensile strength and flexural strength of concrete. Split tensile strength measurements after adding nail waste with varying amounts of 0%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% were 2.279 MPa, 2.408 MPa, 2.068 MPa, and 1.583 MPa. The optimum variation was 1%, with an increase of approximately 5.64% of concrete without mixed waste nails. The variation of nail waste also produces flexural strength values of 1.95 MPa, 2.47 MPa, 2.21 MPa, and 1.43 MPa, so the optimum variation is 1%, with an increase of about 26.67% from the concrete without nail waste mixture.


Keywords: Normal Concrete, Waste Nail, Mechanical Properties.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. G. Sarya, N. Rochmah, and I. Lukmansyah, “Pengaruh Paku sebagai Bahan Tambah Terhadap Kuat Tarik Belah Beton,” J. Has. Penelit. LPPM UNTAG, vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 113–120, 2018, Accessed: Dec. 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/jhp17
  2. P. S. Zalukhu, Irwan, and D. M. Hutauruk, “Pengaruh Penambahan Serat Sabut Kelapa (Coco fiber) terhadap Campuran Beton sebagai Peredam Suara,” JCEBT(Journal Civ. Eng. Build. Transp., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jcebt
  3. I. G. M. Sudika, N. K. Astariani, and I. N. Suardana, “Pengaruh dan Perbandingan Serat Ijuk Lokal Bali dengan Serta Ijuk Lombok Pada Campuran Beton Normal terhadap Kuat Tekan dan Tarik Belah Beton,” J. Tek. Gradien, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 199–214, 2017, Accessed: Apr. 20, 2022. Online]. Available: https://ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/teknikgradien/article/view/138
  4. A. V. Sihotang, A. Wibowo, and C. Remayanti, “Pengaruh Variasi Panjang Kait (Interlocking) Serat Kawat Loket Lapis PVC terhadap Lendutan dan Kuat Lentur Balok Beton Bertulang,” J. Mhs. J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 1, no. 2, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://sipil.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jmts/article/view/517
  5. Marbawi and I. Gunawan, “Pemanfaatan Serat dari Resam sebagai Bahan Tambah dalam Pembuatan Beton,” J. Fropil, pp. 96–106, 2015.
  6. P. Nugraha and A. Antoni, TEKNOLOGI BETON: dari Material, Pembuatan, ke Beton Kinerja Tinggi, I. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2007.
  7. K. Amna, W. Wesli, and H. Hamzani, “Pengaruh Penambahan Serat Tandan Sawit terhadap Kuat Tekan dan Kuat Lentur Beton,” Teras J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 11–20, 2017, doi: 10.29103/tj.v4i2.19.
  8. ACI Committee 544, ACI 544.4R-18 Guide to Design with Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2018.
  9. L. A. Istiani, “Pengaruh Penambahan Paku terhadap Kuat Tekan dan Kuat Tarik Belah pada Beton,” 2017.
  10. A. Widodo, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Potongan Kawat Bendrat pada Campuran Beton dengan Konsentrasi Serat Panjang 4 Cm Berat Semen 350 Kg/m3 dan FAS 0,5,” J. Tek. Sipil Perenc., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 2012, Accessed: Apr. 20, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15294/jtsp.v14i2.7092
  11. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “SNI 1974:2011 Cara Uji Kuat Tekan Beton dengan Benda Uji Silinder.” BSN, Jakarta, 2011.
  12. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “SNI 2491:2014 Metode Uji Kekuatan Tarik Belah Spesimen Beton Silinder.” BSN, Jakarta, 2014.
  13. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “SNI 4431:2011 Cara Uji Kuat Lentur Beton Normal dengan Dua Titik Pembebanan,” Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia. BSN, Jakarta, 2011.
  14. ACI Comittee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary. Farmington Hill: American Concrete Institute, 2008.
  15. A. Anggita, E. T. Wahyuni, and N. H. Aprilita, “Pengujian Metode Pelarutan dengan Menggunakan Asam Sitrat untuk Konservasi Benda Cagar Budaya Berbahan Logam Cu,” Universitas Gajah Mada, 2016.
  16. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “SNI 03-2834-2002 Tata Cara Pembuatan Rencana Campuran Beton Normal.” BSN, Jakarta, 2002.
  17. I. Machali, Statistik itu Mudah: Menggunakan SPSS sebagai Alat Bantu Statistik. Yogyakarta: Ladang Kota, 2015.
  18. A. Widarjono, Analisis Regresi dengan SPSS, I. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 201.