PERBANDINGAN ESTIMASI BIAYA STRUKTUR BANGUNAN ANTARA SOFTWARE AUTODESK REVIT DENGAN CUBICOST

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 17, 2023
https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v5i1.4620
Download
PERBANDINGAN ESTIMASI BIAYA STRUKTUR BANGUNAN ANTARA SOFTWARE AUTODESK REVIT DENGAN CUBICOST
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Construction and Material Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 Maret 2023

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ayu Herzanita
Universitas Pancasila
Refina Putri Anggraini
Universitas Pancasila

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) software commonly used in Indonesia to calculate cost estimates includes Autodesk Revit and Cubicost. Previous studies have shown significant differences comparing the estimated cost of structural work in Autodesk Revit with conventional methods. Further study is needed to compare Autodesk Revit with Cubicost in the same project, with the purpose of knowing the difference in the estimated cost of structural work. The object of this study was the Urban Homes Residential Apartment construction project by reviewing the upper structure. The chosen research strategy was in accordance with the case study objectives. The process begins with the preparating of the WBS (Work Breakdown Structure), designing the BIM 3D, calculating the estimated structural work cost resulting from quantity takeoff using work unit price analysis, and analyzing the estimated cost comparison between Cubicost and Revit BIM software. Based on the analysis results, the estimated cost of building structures using Cubicost is Rp 80,485,995,692, - and has differences of ±13.1% compared to using Revit.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. A. Muhsin, R. S. Yasyfa Prawiradinata, and Y. Nur Razaq, “Perbandingan Antara Alur Kerja BIM Dengan CAD Pada Proses Renovasi Rumah Tinggal,” Jurnal Arsitektur TERRACOTTA |, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 194–204, 2021.
  2. A. Suwarni and B. Anondho, “Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Kolom Beton antara Building Information Modeling dengan Metode Konvensional,” vol. VI No II., pp. 75–83, 2021.
  3. Z. Q. Liu, F. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “The building information modeling and its use for data transformation in the structural design stage,” Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 273–284, 2016, doi: 10.6180/jase.2016.19.3.05.
  4. P. Wahyu Setya, “Penerapan BIM Based Cost Estimation Menggunakan Tekla Structures dan Ibuild,” 2017.
  5. R. Dwi Novita and E. K. Pangestuti, “Analisa Quantity Take Off dan Rencana Anggaran Biaya dengan Metode Building Information Modeling (BIM) Menggunakan Software Autodeks Revit 2019 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Lp3 Universitas Negeri Semarang),” vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27–31, Jun. 2021.
  6. R. P. Anggraini and A. Herzanita, “Estimasi Biaya Struktur Bangunan Menggunakan BIM (Building Information Modelling) (Estimation of Building Structure Costs Using BIM),” 2022.
  7. P. K. Zahro, A. Ratnaningsih, and A. Hasanuddin, “Evaluasi Perancangan Anggaran Biaya dan Waktu Menggunakan Metode BIM,” TERAS JURNAL, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 507, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.29103/tj. v11i2.529.
  8. R. I. Rizaldi, I. Farni, and R. Mulyani, “Kajian Potensi Bangunan Building Information Modeling (BIM) dalam Merencanakan Gedung di Indonesia”.