IMPLEMENTASI BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING 4D (Studi Kasus: Proyek Lanjutan Pembangunan Gedung Kantor Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Tapin)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 29, 2022
https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v4i1.4427
Download
IMPLEMENTASI BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING 4D (Studi Kasus: Proyek Lanjutan Pembangunan Gedung Kantor Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Tapin)
Statistic
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Construction and Material Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 Maret 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Husnul Khatimi
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Kristnanda Floter Pardosi
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Abstract

Advanced Project of the Tapin District Secretariat Office Building located on Jalan Datu Suban, North Tapin, South Kalimantan is a reinforced concrete building project that only applies manual scheduling which is present in the form of S Curve. PUPR Ministerial Regulation Number 9 of 2021 states that every project should be based on Building Information Modeling (BIM). Therefore, this research discusses about the implementation of 4D BIM (scheduling) using Tekla on the advanced Project of the Tapin District Secretariat Office Building using Tekla to determine the use of BIM on scheduling obtained from contractors. This research method started from studying the software and the object to be modeled, collecting the data such as as-build, S Curve, budget plan. Data processing started from 3D modeling using Tekla Structures 2020, scheduling with Tekla Task Manager, and then 4D modeling with object representation. Scheduling made from the Budget Plan, S Curve, and interviews of related parties were input into the Tekla Task Manager with dependencies which were applied into the bar chart. The 4D model is created using the visual logic with the integration of the 3D model created by scheduling, the development planning stages can be displayed according to the reviewed date. It was concluded that Tekla Structures can be applied in scheduling the advanced project for the construction of the Tapin District Secretariat Office Building.


Keywords: Scheduling, Tekla Structures, Tekla Task Manager, 4D Model, Advanced Project.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. E. K. Kermanshahi, M. B. M. Tahir, N. H. A. Shukor Lim, A. T. Balasbaneh, and S. Roshanghalb, “Implementation of Building Information Modeling for Construction Clash Detection Process in the Design Stage: A Case Study of Malaysian Police Headquarter Building,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 476, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/476/1/012009.
  2. C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. 2011.
  3. B. Adhi, Hidayat, and Nugroho, “Perbandingan Evisiensi Waktu,Biaya dan Sumber Daya Manusia Antara Metode BIM dan Konvensional (Studi kasus :Perencanaan Gedung 20 Lantai),” vol. 5, pp. 220–229, 2016.
  4. C. W. Sakti, “PERMODELAN DENGAN MENERAPKAN KONSEP BIM 4 DIMENSI MENGGUNAKAN SOFTWARE TEKLA CAMPUS (PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG RAPAT BAKEUDA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN TAHAP 1),” 2020.
  5. H. Parung et al., “Sosialisasi Aplikasi Teknologi Building Information Modelling ( BIM ) pada Sektor Konstruksi Indonesia,” vol. 2, pp. 112–119, 2019.
  6. A. Yudi, M. S. Ulum, and M. T. Nugroho, “PERANCANGAN DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT BERBASIS BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING ( Studi Kasus : Asrama Institut Teknologi Sumatera ),” Media Komun. Tek. Sipil, vol. 00, no. 00, 2020.
  7. W. N. Shofa, I. Soejanto, and T. Ristyowati, “Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Penerapan Simulasi Monte Carlo Pada Metode Program Evaluation Review and Technique (Pert),” Opsi, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 150, 2017, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v10i2.2110.
  8. Y. Sutomo, S. Anwar, and A. Firmanto, “Analisis Manajemen Proyek Pembangunan Kantor PT. Prima Multi Usaha Indonesia Yudi,” J. Konstr., vol. V, no. 4, pp. 435–445, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/Konstruksi/article/viewFile/3807/1848.
  9. R. A. Nur, “PENGENDALIAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU PADA PROYEK PENYELESAIAN GEDUNG PERAWATAN OBSGYN DAN ANAK (DUA LANTAI) (Study Kasus : RSUD Kolonedale Kabupaten Morowali Utara),” J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2018.
  10. A. R. Amalia, “Studi Literatur Tentang Program Bantu Autodesk Revit Structure.,” 2010.
  11. A. Adriansyah, “Faktor-Faktor Berpengaruh dalam Penerapan Critical Chain Project Management dan Building Information Modeling (BIM) 4D pada Pekerjaan Struktur Gedung Hunian Bertingkat Tinggi,” Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 18, 2019, doi: 10.22441/jrs.2019.v08.i1.03.
  12. Trimble, “Powerful structural BIM software for better projects,” 2013-05-17, 2013. https://www.tekla.com/products/tekla-structures (accessed Apr. 06, 2021).
  13. S. Firoz and S. K. Rao, “Modelling Concept of Sustainable Steel Building by Tekla Software,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 18–24, 2012, [Online]. Available: www.ijerd.com.
  14. P. H. Simatupang, T. M. W. Sir, and V. A. Wadu, “Integrasi Program Tekla Structures Dan Sap2000 Dalam Perencanaan Gedung Beton Struktural,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67–80, 2020.
  15. Trimble, “Trimble Connect,” 2020. https://www.tekla.com/id/produk/trimble-connect.
  16. M. Ylimäki, “Tietomallipohjaisen tuotannon- ohjauksen kehittäminen asun- torakentamisessa,” 2020.
  17. A. Härkönen, “Trimble Connectin käyttö sillanrakentamisessa,” 2018.
  18. A. A. Latiffi, J. Brahim, S. Mohd, and M. S. Fathi, “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Exploring Level of Development (LOD) in Construction Projects,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 773–774, pp. 933–937, 2015, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.773-774.933.
  19. SrinSoft, “BIM Level of Development (LOD) 100, 200, 300, 400 & 500,” 2020. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Q0p2RAYJN90J:https://www.srinsofttech.com/bim-level-of-development-lod-300-400-500.html+&cd=18&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=id (accessed Apr. 06, 2021).