PELAKSANAAN PEKERJAAN STRUKTUR ATAS DENGAN BETON PRACETAK PADA PROYEK GEDUNG

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sri Haryati
Andrias Rudi Hermawan

Abstract

The implementation of upper structure works in the BPJS Kesehatan Jakarta Pusat building project, using conventional reinforced concrete in the process which requires a long time. However, the needs for constructing a BPJS building service center encourages effective and efficient methods of carrying out structural work in terms of timeliness, practicality, strength, and stability of the structure. Precast reinforced concrete structures as an alternative technology in carrying out structural work have several advantages over conventional reinforced concrete. The main differences are the connection, concrete quality, and erection; significantly related to the cost and time of implementation. This study aims to calculate the connection using the wet connection system, analyze aspects of cost, quality, time, and work implementation of the use of precast reinforced concrete by making comparisons using conventional reinforced concrete in the BPJS Kesehatan Jakarta Pusat building project. This research was conducted by analyzing the method of carrying out structural work on precast concrete. The data needed is in the form of unit yard prices, Standard Operating Procedures for implementing precast concrete works, unit prices for precast concrete products. Data collections are done by direct observation and interview with Project Manager. Calculation of distribution length for precast concrete joints refers to SNI 2847: 2013 while the cost of precast concrete refers to SNI 7832: 2017. The results of the study stated that lap-splice (ld) for the 420 mm beam-beam connection of 228 mm hooks, 320 mm beam of 228 mm hooks, between the plates of 150 mm, columns of 880 mm; the cost decreased 25,43% compared to conventional concrete; precast concrete takes 56 days, 7 days faster or 11,11% compared to conventional concrete.


Keywords: Precast Concrete, Implementation Method, Joint, Cost and Time.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. G. P. S, 2016, Perancangan Ulang Gedung Skysuites Soho Kedung Baruk Surabaya Menggunakan Metode Beton Pracetak Dengan Sistem Rangka Gedung, Surabaya.
  2. V. S. Vyas, 2015, Survey of Precast Concrete Method and Cast in Situ Concrete Method, Int. J. Eng. Tech. Res., vol. 3, no. 11, hal. 70–73.
  3. S. A. Nurjannah, 2011, Perkembangan Sistem Struktur Beton Pracetak Sebagai Alternatif pada Teknologi Konstruksi Indonesia yang Mendukung Efisiensi Energi Serta Ramah Lingkungan, Pros. Semin. Nas. AVoER ke 3, hal. 234–242.
  4. A. M. Adiasa, D. K. Prakosa, J. U. D. Hatmoko, dan T. D. Santoso, 2014, Evaluasi Penggunaan Beton Precast Di Proyek Konstruksi, J. Karya Tek. Sipil, vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 126–134.
  5. B. R. K. Holla, S. Anant, M. A. Mohammad, A. Periwal, dan A. Kapoor, 2016, Time,Cost, Productivity and Quality analysis of Precast Concrete System, IIJISET - Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 5, hal. 252–257.
  6. A. B. Indrayana, M. Irmawan, dan Fairmun, 2013, Analisa Desain Sambungan Balok-Kolom Sistem Pracetak Untuk Ruko Tiga Lantai, J. Tek. POMITS, vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 1–6.
  7. C. H. Najoan, J. Tjakra, dan P. A. K. Pratasis, 2016, Analisis Metode Pelaksanaan Plat Precast Dengan Plat Konvensional Ditinjau Dari Waktu Dan Biaya (Studi Kasus : Markas Komando Daerah Militer Manado), J. Sipil Statik, vol. 4, no. 5, hal. 319–327.
  8. Badan Standarisasi Indonesia, 2013, Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung, Jakarta.
  9. Badan Standarisasi Indonesia, 2017, Tata cara perhitungan harga satuan pekerjaan beton pracetak untuk konstruksi bangunan gedung, Jakarta.
  10. Badan Standarisasi Indonesia, 2012, Tata cara perancangan beton pracetak dan beton prategang untuk bangunan gedung. Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
  11. P. I. H. Committee dan Neal, 2004, PCI DESING HANDBOOK 6th Precast and Prestressed Concrete, Chicago.
  12. W. I. Ervianto, 2009 Pengukuran Produktivitas Kelompok Pekerja Bangunan Dalam Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Proyek Gedung Bertingkat Di Surakarta), J. Tek. Sipil Univ. Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, vol. 9, no. 1, hal. 31-42–42.
  13. M. U. Putri, J. W. S, dan A. Ratnaningsih, 2014, Konvensional Dan Pracetak Ditinjau Dari Segi Waktu Dan Biaya ( Study Implementation Of Structural Work Efficiency Beam Column Conventional Methods And Precast Seen From The Aspect Of Time And Costs ( Case Study Project Sport Center Jember, Jember ), hal. 1–5.
  14. Wijaksono,O, et all,2018,Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi Waktu dan Biaya antara Metode Konvensional Slab,Precat Half Slab dan Precast Full Slab Pada Proyek Bangunan Hotel Bertingkat di Surabaya, Jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/semnastek.