Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

This Journal focus on accountancy, Finance, banking and stock market

Fukus dibidang Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Perbankan and pasar modal

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Kebijakan Review

  1. Artikel akan direview oleh dua orang reviwer dan kedua orang tersebut tidak saling mengetahui.
  2. Artikel yang dikirim ke reviwer tidak mencatumkan nama dan institusi penulis.
  3. Tim editor yang memberitahu hasil review kepada penulis untuk diperbaiki sesuai dengan hasil review.
  4. Keputusan untuk diterbitkan mutlak ada di tim editor.
  5. Untuk saat ini penulis dapat memasukan artikel melalui website ini atau mengirimkannya ke account@akuntansi.pnj.ac.id

 

 

Publication Frequency

Accout publishes in Jun and December Every Years

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics Statement

This journal follows guidelines from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in facing all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication misconduct. 

Account adapts COPE to meet high quality standard of ethics for publisher, editors, authors, and reviewers. As an essential issue, publication ethics needs to be explained clearly to improve the quality of the research worldwide. In this part, we explain the standard for editors, authors, and reviewers. In addition, publisher don’t have right to interfere with the integrity of the contents and only support to publish in timely manner.

For Editors

  1. Editors should be responsible for every articles published in Account.
  2. Editors should help authors to follow the instruction for author.
  3. The editors may communicate with other editors or reviewers in making the final decision.
  4. An editor has to evaluate the manuscript objectively for publication, judging each on its quality without looking to nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors. He/she should decline his/her assignment when there is a potential of conflict of interest.
  5. Editors need to ensure the document sent to the reviewer does not contain the information of the author, vice versa.
  6. Editors’ decision should be informed to authors accompanied by reviewers’ comments unless they contain offensive or libellous remarks.
  7. Editors should respect requests from authors that an individual should not review the submission, if these are well-reasoned and practicable.
  8. Editors and all staffs should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.
  9. Editors will be guided by COPE flowcharts if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.

For Reviewers

  1. Reviewers need to comment on ethical questions and possible research and publication misconduct.
  2. Reviewers will do the work in timely manner and should notify editor if they can not complete the work.
  3. Reviewers need to keep the confidentiality of the manuscript.
  4. Reviewers should not accept to review the manuscripts in which there is potential conflict of interest between them and any of the authors.

For Authors

  1. Author(s) affirm that the material has not been previously published and that they have not trans­ferred elsewhere any rights to the article.
  2. Author(s) should ensure the originality of the work and they have properly cited others’ work in accordance of the references format.
  3. Author(s) should not engage in plagiarism nor self-plagiarism.
  4. Author(s) should ensure that they follow the authorship criteria that is explained in instruction for author.
  5. Author(s) should give the editor the data and details of the work, if there are suspicions of data falsification or fabrication.
  6. Authors of the journal should clarify everything that may cause conflict of interests such as work, research expenses and consul­tant expenses.

account Team